Wetlook World ForumCurrent time: Sat 11/05/24 14:17:37 GMT |
Message # 89866.1.1.1.1.1.1.1.1.2 Subject: Re:different fabrics! Date: Sun 07/08/22 22:21:47 GMT Name: Eamon Email: assin9@hotmail.com |
Report Abuse or Problem to Nigel at Minxmovies
|
White has to be one of the best among light colors when wet as long as they are like painted on tight and can be so revealing. |
In reply to Message (89866.1.1.1.1.1.1.1.1) different fabrics!
By NCgreg231LC2 - Fri 05/08/22 13:57:09 GMT Website: https://www.dhmo.org/facts.html 2 fabrics that (imho) have the best cling are thin cotton and silk. black and navy-blue are the choices for those that enjoy seeing the shine that saturated fabric will momentarily have. My preference is light colors - yellow, light blue, PINK etc that won't have the see-thru/invisible effect that white often has! I watched a girl jump in a lake to cool off last week wearing a medium weight/ribbed t-shirt, and it didn't cling as well as thin cotton would have...
the clothing has to be JUST SLIGHTLY loose. If its too tight, then the material won't have the same "wrinkling" effect, and like i just said, too loose, and the extra material plus water weight will pull the clothing off of the beautiful curves that we all love to see!
Oh yeah, stay away from any kind of printing, stripes somewhat as well, because it is the solid colors that are most revealing of the saturation of the material!
and that reminds me, if you never heard of it before, you might consider joining the movement to ban dihydrogen monoxide... i think you'll agree it killed THOUSANDS over the years?
|
In reply to Message (89866.1.1.1.1.1.1.1) Nope
By Malvineous - mrnemesis@ntlworld.com Fri 05/08/22 08:44:36 GMT Never paid fashion all that much attention.
I pay attention to all sorts of other things in the world, and that is how you remain single for eternity. |
In reply to Message (89866.1.1.1.1.1.1) Didn't you observe that the fashion style of jeans completely changed ? [nt]
By plonss - Fri 05/08/22 08:38:04 GMT (no text) |
In reply to Message (89866.1.1.1.1.1) Heh …
By Malvineous - mrnemesis@ntlworld.com Tue 02/08/22 23:38:09 GMT After all the years I have been alive, I can’t say that I have ever really noticed a difference between jeans brands. I notice the ones with more holes in from new, than the most worn-one ones I’ve ever owned. I found jeans sucked when performing any task that required kneeling/crouching, because the thick bulk of fabric that stacks up behind your knee digs into your leg, but lighter-weight jeans don’t seem to be as troublesome. (Mine were far too thick and heavy.)
I tend to pay more attention to hair and tops! After all these years, I still don’t understand which materials and outfits (blouse, t-shirt, dress etc; cotton, polyester, wool etc; plain, patterned, stripy etc) cling the most and show through the most.
My ideal is clothes that look completely modest when dry, and when wet, clingy but not see-through, i.e. you can’t see any naked skin, but the fabric clings to every curve. Surprisingly few materials and outfits do this. Patterns can be so bad as to act as a perfect camouflage to body shape!
Jeans … jeans just go shiny, which of course is good in itself! A lot of materials go dark but still look dry, but jeans are one of the better options. |
In reply to Message (89866.1.1.1.1) Re:not to speak about these jeans so wide that you can dress elephants in them
By Levi's fan - Tue 02/08/22 21:07:53 GMT I really liked Curve ID and Revel jeans, but even before those, they had some nice pairs, sadly only in Europe or Japan. But now, most can be found on eBay or a site called From Japan. Levi's made 519, 513, 511, 506, 504, and 503 with a white patch with the letters and the horse logo red. Some were identical, but the label was sort of yellow and looked woven, with the red letters, but most of those pairs on eBay now are either missing the patch, or it's hanging off. For women, some nice pairs were 570, 571, 572, 579, 470, 471, 472, 479, 603, 613, and 686. |
In reply to Message (89866.1.1.1) not to speak about these jeans so wide that you can dress elephants in them [nt]
By plonss - Tue 02/08/22 20:43:42 GMT (no text) |
In reply to Message (89866.1.1) Re:from a bygone era jeans were still tight ..
By Levi's Fan - Tue 02/08/22 03:10:46 GMT Yeah, for a brief time in the 2000's to a little while ago, they made some nice looking pairs of Levi's. Now all their pairs just try to mimic 501's, regardless of the number on the jeans. |
In reply to Message (89866.1) from a bygone era jeans were still tight .. [nt]
By plonss - Mon 01/08/22 22:54:47 GMT (no text) |
In reply to Message (89866) Nice ad and pictures
By Levi's fan - Mon 01/08/22 09:20:57 GMT Some of you have probably already seen this "Ladies in Levi's" ad, but this page also has nice wet photos from the day it was filmed. Around 32 seconds into the video, a woman runs under a waterfall in a white shirt and Levi's and dances while getting wet. Unfortunately, this video seems somewhat edited and shortens the part of her under the waterfall, and the only longer video I can find is private on YouTube.
http://marianacobra.com/portfolio/ladiesin / www.marianacobra.com/portfolio/ladiesin
|
Report Abuse or Problem to Nigel at Minxmovies
If you enjoy this forum, then please make a small donation to help with running costs:
(you can change amount)
|
[ This page took 0.156 seconds to generate ]