Wetlook World Forum

Current time: Sun 28/04/24 04:14:51 GMT

Translate page FROM -> TO

Translate page TO <- FROM

Message # 56577.3

Subject: Re:sin

Date: Wed 02/01/13 01:50:20 GMT

Name: AnthonyX

Email: anthonyx@jowc.net

Website:

Report Abuse or Problem to Nigel at Minxmovies
If you enjoy this forum, then please make a small donation to help
with running costs: (you can change amount)

"Right", "wrong", and "sin" (if you are religious) are moral judgements we make based on our own individual values. In a free society, it isn't something you are required to accept from someone else; you decide for yourself.

What we call "production" wetlook is produced (usually) for erotic enjoyment. Using something for its intended purpose (when noone gets hurt) can't be wrong. The models understand the full nature of what they are doing (especially in more overtly sexual material). Candid material is another matter.

Doing something pleasureable is not intrinsically "wrong". Children are taught what is right and what is wrong, usually by example, and must infer a set of general rules; sometimes an incorrect inference is made, and that might lead some to believe that anything pleasurable is somehow "wrong".

As stated elsewhere on this thread, lust is a basic biological drive to initiate reproduction and ensure species survival. Without our ancestors experiencing and acting on lust, none of us would exist. Therefore if lust is wrong, then so is all of human existence.

Lust directed inappropriately is another matter. Lust for the person who lusts for you is great. Lust over an image, or a video clip is harmless, so long as you don't start stalking its subject (or worse).

In summary: relax... enjoy.

In reply to Message (56577)

sin

By Martin - Sun 30/12/12 13:46:37 GMT

Website:

Is wetlook wrong in general? Should we lust after these girls?

Report Abuse or Problem to Nigel at Minxmovies
If you enjoy this forum, then please make a small donation to help with running costs: (you can change amount)