Wetlook World Forum

Current time: Fri 26/04/24 19:22:05 GMT

Translate page FROM -> TO

Translate page TO <- FROM

Message # 54833.1.1.1.1.1.1

Subject: Re:Well said

Date: Sun 08/07/12 03:51:16 GMT

Name: guitarguy

Email:

Website:

Report Abuse or Problem to Nigel at Minxmovies
If you enjoy this forum, then please make a small donation to help
with running costs: (you can change amount)

I remember Lisa, and Ivy, another model who can be found in modeling pictures across the web. Lisa was a great actress who played the part of a professional office girl wo has an insatiable appetite for getting wet. She was attractive and very funny! I would risk to say she did actually enjoy her work. Ivy also seemed to enjoy her wet experience.

Well, there's no doubt that wetlook is produced largely for the male wet fetishist. I see no problem with it, ethically or morally. Everyone has a fetish, whether they want to admit it or not. So, the fantasy of wetlook satisfys this at a fair price, and no harm done to the parties involved in producing it. Discretion is encouraged, since not everyone feels comfortable with another person's personal preferences. What we do in private should be left alone,

One exception is this forum, where we share a common interest, or similar ones!

It's a shame the anglo-puritan influence is still so deeply rooted in the USA, and maybe to a lesser degree in the UK. Corporate personal conduct rules are still largely underscored, fundamentally, by 18th century puritan codes of conduct. If not for the Puritans, perhaps the world would be worse off than it is (I am convinced this is true) Their ethical premise is arguably correct although extreme in practice. Tempered by the secular world, anglo-puritan influence is scarcely noticed, but it's still there and this is why we have corporate watchdogs who (have no right) to dictate what a person should or should not do harmlessly in the private sector.

The way I see it, the models are mostly in it for the money, and/or a new experience, and/or just to be the hotties they are, and doing the wet clothes thing because it's fun and sexy. What woman doesn't want to look and feel sexy? Who admires their work is outside their control. He may be a young man, or a disgusting old fat one.

Just putting that in perspective, I am a musician. Let's say I make an album, and go on tour. If my only fans were BBW's throwing their underwear at me, I would probably retire! LOL If on the other hand they were among a mixed crowd, you just take it in stride!

In reply to Message (54833.1.1.1.1.1)

Well said

By AnthonyX - anthonyx@jowc.net Sat 07/07/12 15:54:27 GMT

Website:

When it comes to the written word, I generally appreciate "correctness", eloquence, and an avoidance of slang, but this is one time, Lisa, when I have to admire the way you made your point. I suppose there are times when no other words will convey the idea.

I do wonder about the effect it has on a woman's future to do this sort of modeling (even though most of it is pretty tame). In some ways the internet can inconveniently forget some things we'd wish it to remember, but it can also very inconveniently remember - for a very long time - things we'd wish it to forget.

We can become fans of certain models and wish them to continue to do things we like to see, but we can never forget that they are people with lives and future plans. When they decide it's time to move on, we have to respect that.

Makes me think of a model for "Wetlook Unlimited" named Lisa. Pretty sure I remember her making a statement somewhere that she wanted to get into the hospitality industry (i.e. hotel management). I have also seen evidence that she has done some pretty hard-core fetish modeling (there are at least a handful of explicit photos floating around). Leaves me to wonder if that was a serious statement about her career intention, and if so, how vulnerable those plans might be to the fickle memory of the internet over her past work.

Lets hope Steph can move on with her career unhindered.

In reply to Message (54833.1.1.1.1)

Re:Looking for Steph!

By LisaMoomin - leonmoomin@ntlworld.com Sat 07/07/12 08:24:50 GMT

Website:

In Steph's case it is career related!

Thanks we do try to make our work as artistic as possible, but the end result is its media for people to jack off to, and that doesn't support every career choice and agency!

In reply to Message (54833.1.1.1)

Re:Looking for Steph!

By 1wamnut - tim_gipe@yahoo.com Sat 07/07/12 04:39:01 GMT

Website:

Forgive me Lisa for prying into your business, but what is it that prohibits models from shooting wetlook? My first thoughts are either career related or a jealous lover? Either way, wetlook from you and Leon isn't considered "porn" is it? So I don't quite understand why a model could no longer shoot with you two. Your work is very tasteful and modest and professional. Again, not trying to pry, just curious. Thanks.

In reply to Message (54833.1.1)

Re:Looking for Steph!

By LisaMoomin - leonmoomin@ntlworld.com Thu 05/07/12 12:35:48 GMT

Website:

Steph is no longer working for us or any other wam producer.

Steph's a great friend and is doing really well for herself but is not able to shoot anymore.

Sorry.

LisaMoomin

In reply to Message (54833.1)

Re:Looking for Steph!

By Wetlooky - Thu 05/07/12 12:28:14 GMT

Website:

Hello, you are doing always a good job and we all have pleasure viewing all your new updates on all websites.

But please let me know where is your beautiful model "Steph". I hvae not seen any update of her the last year?

Many greets,

wetlooky

In reply to Message (54833)

Sarah's Back!

By LisaMoomin - leonmoomin@ntlworld.com Thu 05/07/12 09:25:09 GMT

Website: streetsplash.com

Sarah!

mostwam.com

ALSO, now available in the Mostwam Download Store for only $4.99!!!

We now accept PayPal for Download Store purchases!!!

Mostwam Download Store!

Report Abuse or Problem to Nigel at Minxmovies
If you enjoy this forum, then please make a small donation to help with running costs: (you can change amount)