Wetlook World Forum

Message # 53525.6.1

Subject: Re:question about married couples: wetlooker and non-participating individual

Date: Wed 29/02/12 00:21:25 GMT

Name: J.L

Email: eepapadumais@yahoo.com

Website:

By AnthonyX - anthonyx@jowc.net Tue 28/02/12 14:52:33 GMT

Website:

I've come upon the "you must be gay if you don't like naked women" line before. Perhaps it's because the woman saying it feels that instead of her being the object of his sexual interest, it is the pantyhose, or high heels, wet clothes, or whatever the guy is in to, and that she feels that her role in his sexual pleasure is either minimal or non-existent. I can certainly see how it can be a blow to a woman's ego, but it's based on a misunderstanding.

By Jessica - friends@fantasystockings.com Mon 27/02/12 08:43:22 GMT

Website: http://www.fantasystockings.com/wetlook// www.fantasystockings.com/wetlook

Hello,

My youtube channel mostly deals with pantyhose fetish and I must admit that I get a lot of upset e-mails about how the wife doesn't want to wear pantyhose for the husband at all, not even on special occasions.  In fact, I am trying to put together a section of my blog that explains fetishes and gives advice to such couples on how to understand what fetish means and why someone can't get rid of it at will just because the partner wants it so.  

I don't seem to be getting anything of that sort from wetlookers.  Nobody wrote to me so far that their partner doesn't want to share their love for splashing.  

Do you think that wetlook fetish is more socially acceptable then pantyhose fetish?  

Even let's say Felini did a scene for Dolce Vita in a fountain...  but I haven't seen any movies of women going to bed in pantyhose.  Stockings - yes, but not pantyhose.

I'd be happy to know what you think.  

Jessica

http://www.fantasystockings.com/private/ / www.fantasystockings.com/private  (pantyhose fetish)

http://www.fantasystockings.com/wetlook/ / www.fantasystockings.com/wetlook (wetlook)