Wetlook World ForumCurrent time: Sat 27/04/24 02:00:36 GMT |
Message # 43610.1.3 Subject: Re:Nigel did not delete your post! Date: Tue 23/03/10 12:04:08 GMT Name: Rono |
Report Abuse or Problem to Nigel at Minxmovies
|
I have to admit, that wet lingerie "in action" is not offensive to me. I find it more offensive to see all the candid teenagers on family- or birthday parties, who post things for fun and find themselves on this forum. For me (and supposedly for most of the others) wetlook is a 99% sexual thing, and therefor something that the two parties have to agree on. This is not the case with all the underaged candid stuff BUT for the porn thing. I can find wet porn outside the forum for myself that is not the point. If you say it is a violation ok then it is and it is banned, but I'd simply wish you'd be as harsh with the other topic because it really offends me when I search for wetlook and be confronted with kids. No joke, it offends me. |
In reply to Message (43610.1) Nigel did not delete your post!
By spam patrol - Tue 23/03/10 11:44:55 GMT You're in direct violation with Rule 2.9. You're posting pure hard core sex that doesn't belong on this forum! It contains very little or no wetlook and once there are negative responses, it should be clean enough that you're postings are not welcome here. There has been many postings in the past that has hard core sex, but the majority contained legitimate wetlook with hardcore sex towards the end. You Sir are displaying a 100% sex show!
If you wish to contribute, please don't post anything that's offensive to the majority here!
Spam Patrol
|
In reply to Message (43610) Nigel, why did you delete my post again ?!
By Pierre - Tue 23/03/10 11:31:28 GMT What's wrong with the link ? Sex is not welcome here ? |
Report Abuse or Problem to Nigel at Minxmovies
If you enjoy this forum, then please make a small donation to help with running costs:
(you can change amount)
|
[ This page took 0.036 seconds to generate ]