Wetlook World ForumCurrent time: Fri 26/04/24 13:21:06 GMT |
Message # 39380.20.1 Subject: Re: Which is your preference?? Date: Sun 15/03/09 12:58:11 GMT Name: EdR |
Report Abuse or Problem to Nigel at Minxmovies
|
We really appreciate all of the kudos and any constructive criticisms, as for the differences between the posed look as opposed to the natural look, we actually prefer to do both. I try to incorporate a unique style to our work, which can include a very posed magazine-like look to a more natural look with the theme always being glamour. Many of the sets we offer will have a mix of both "posed and candid" and the models we work with are excellent at doing it all.
Thank you Sincerely EdR & Tess |
In reply to Message (39380.20) Re: Which is your preference??
By MaK - Sun 15/03/09 11:57:39 GMT I prefer no. 1 and 3 from these three sets.
You are an excellent photographer, who really knows how to utilize the lighting. Many could learn a lot from this.
Should I give some criticism it is about the look in the face of your girls? You obviously prefer the "naughty" look and pictures where the girls are modeling instead of behaving in a natural way. I prefer the girls to be more natural and smiling - maybe only to themselves, so that it is obvious that they like what they are doing. In many of the best pictures and those, which tell a story, the photographer is only "a fly on the wall".
|
In reply to Message (39380) Which is your preference??
By EdR - Sat 14/03/09 01:20:43 GMT Website: www.asplashofglamour.com So we have updated 3 different sets, in 3 different locations....Your input would be great.... do you prefer...Nightime pool shots such as this:
or in the Shower with garters and stockings like this:
or maybe Sunset at the beach in a little black Cocktail dress like this:
Whatever your pleasure...let us know
and as always thank you ...
|
Report Abuse or Problem to Nigel at Minxmovies
If you enjoy this forum, then please make a small donation to help with running costs:
(you can change amount)
|
[ This page took 0.024 seconds to generate ]