Wetlook World ForumCurrent time: Fri 26/04/24 14:38:06 GMT |
Message # 29298.2 Subject: Re: webshots vs youtube: poll Date: Thu 24/05/07 08:14:18 GMT Name: Desert Hawk |
Report Abuse or Problem to Nigel at Minxmovies
|
Still pictures are better than videos because videos are ssssssssssssllllllllllllllllloooooooooooooooooowwwwwwwwwwwwwwwww using dialup. The resolution on videos sucks. Still pictures are often like HDTV. Videos are worse than VHS at EP speed.
Flickr is much better than Webshots. Webshots is very slow, and their search function sucks. Flickr works faster and their search function is much much better. |
In reply to Message (29298) webshots vs youtube: poll
By francescowet - francescowet@libero.it Thu 24/05/07 06:00:16 GMT Since several months, togheter with the well famous webshots wetlook images (called also wetshots), we have also a lot of video by youtube and similar and this forum is full of both webshots and youtube (in the last period more youtube and similar than webshots). I would like to make a poll: in your opinion are better 'wetshots' photos or youtube video? Wetshots have the advantage that in the most cases have a very good resolution that allow to see a lot of details but are static photos and does not allow to 'see the whole scene'. Instead youtube video allow us to see the whole scene (expecially the candid ones of people trown into the water) but the resolution is always bad.
In my opionion photos are better because allow us to imagine what was happened and the better quality is more exciting.
I'm also interested in your opinion. Do you prefer wetshots or youtube?
Best regards
Francescowet
|
Report Abuse or Problem to Nigel at Minxmovies
If you enjoy this forum, then please make a small donation to help with running costs:
(you can change amount)
|
[ This page took 0.021 seconds to generate ]