Wetlook World Forum

Current time: Sat 27/04/24 02:57:08 GMT

Translate page FROM -> TO

Translate page TO <- FROM

Message # 28288

Subject: Thinking of building a pool

Date: Sat 31/03/07 18:31:18 GMT

Name: Wetfan

Email: wetfan@earthlink.net

Website:

Report Abuse or Problem to Nigel at Minxmovies
If you enjoy this forum, then please make a small donation to help
with running costs: (you can change amount)

As WK indicated in an earlier posting, an in-ground pool does require some work, but not nearly the amount you might think. We had an inground pool installed when we lived in Western Maryland ($25,000) and except for cleaning it out ofter the winter, it was quite easy to maintain throughout the summer. I did a LOT of wetlook photography in that pool and seldom had any problems with fibers, lint, etc. in the filter. After an extended shooting session (e.g., three different changes of outfits) I simple 'shocked it' with chlorine that evening and it was perfectly clear and sparkling the next day.

We had above ground pool for several years prior to 'biting the bullet' and putting in a nice kidney-shaped inground pool. The above-ground ones required a LOT of care and the water was seldom as clear as in the inground pool. It was also more difficult to properly photography the girls getting into and out of the pool, not to mention being pretty much unable to do ANY underwater shots. The girls LOVED the inground one! The bottom line is that if you're going to do wetlook pix regularly, an inground pool is definitely the way to go.

(The original) Wetfan

Report Abuse or Problem to Nigel at Minxmovies
If you enjoy this forum, then please make a small donation to help with running costs: (you can change amount)