minx

Wetlook World Forum

Current time: Fri 26/04/24 14:00:23 GMT

Translate page FROM gb -> TO de fr it nl es pt jp

Translate page TO gb <- FROM de fr it nl es pt jp

WetlookPro

Message # 25769.1.1.1

Subject: Hello Re: Wikipedia and candid wetlook?

Date: Sun 12/11/06 06:28:14 GMT

Name: wetimer uu

Email: isthisobscureenough@yahoo.co.uk

Website:

Report Abuse or Problem to Nigel at Minxmovies
If you enjoy this forum, then please make a small donation to help
with running costs: Make Donation (you can change amount)

Previous Reply
Next New Message
Active List Archive

One of the guys who started wikipaedia is starting a new site called citizendium to address some of the limitations of wikipaedia. This would be one of them! I'm sure if you do a search for it on the web you can find out more. Might be a more rewarding vehicle for your efforts.

 

wetimer

In reply to Message (25769.1.1) Hello Re: Wikipedia and candid wetlook?

By Telcontar - mrnemesis@ntlworld.com gb Sun 12/11/06 01:53:40 GMT

Website:


I do know how Wikipedia works!

 

I just don't want a war over the article, someone coming back and removing the text every time I revert it. If they have a reason why it should be removed, it should be clarified. I will most likely just revert it later (with some text clean-up too).

In reply to Message (25769.1) Hello Re: Wikipedia and candid wetlook?

By WetCasual - klesbader@spray.no no Sun 12/11/06 01:47:46 GMT

Website:


Unfortunately,  that is the problem with Wikipedia - anyone can freely edit articles to their suit... I'd suggest reverting the page to an earlier version (anyone can do that) and, if you're registered, post a complaint in the Talk section about the page.
In reply to Message (25769) Question Wikipedia and candid wetlook?

By Telcontar - mrnemesis@ntlworld.com gb Sat 11/11/06 19:36:45 GMT

Website:


Take a look at this edit to the Wetlook article on Wikipedia:

 

http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wetlook&diff=prev&oldid=81748319

 

An unknown entity delete the entire section on candid wetlook from the page. Can anyone shed any light as to why this edit may have been made? No reason was left and there is no username to lodge a question with, although I posed the question on the article's talk page.

 

To me, it seemed factual and well-written, so why would anyone remove it?

Report Abuse or Problem to Nigel at Minxmovies
If you enjoy this forum, then please make a small donation to help with running costs: Make Donation (you can change amount)

All WAM Drunk Sex Orgy Clips4Sale
Wetlook-Online

Minx Movies - M12 - Dressed in Wet is now in the Download Store
Download Store

Minx Movies - M15 - Wet Me Now is now in the Download Store
Download Store

Minx Movies - M14 - Get Wet With Me is now in the Download Store
2ipmd65.jpg2ipmdg2.jpgckfbj77.jpgjapgs25.jpgzgjbt99.jpg Download Store 2fpbs94.jpgkijws74.jpgrlsps97.jpglasbjg7.jpg2fptg96.jpg2gpdde7.jpg


Minx Movies - M8 - Mask Of Wetness is now in the Download Store
Download Store



[ This page took 0.046 seconds to generate ]