Wetlook World Forum

Current time: Fri 26/04/24 03:26:32 GMT

Translate page FROM -> TO

Translate page TO <- FROM

Message # 25562.2.1.1.1.1

Subject: Re: I agree...

Date: Wed 01/11/06 10:42:28 GMT

Name: leonmoomin

Email: leon@mostwet.com

Website:

Report Abuse or Problem to Nigel at Minxmovies
If you enjoy this forum, then please make a small donation to help
with running costs: (you can change amount)

How is the wambank able to tell who the actual owners of the clips are, as said here, there are free clips that have been foating around for years, there is no way that the wambank can tell who actually made them? Also there is the situation of people making multiple clips of the same scenes! It would not be good for the site to be filled with hundreds of duplicates would it?

As also mentioned some people have no scrupples with posting clips others have made, to be fair though, they can do the same with youtube and have!

Answer, it is to late for clips that people have posted years ago, but in order that your new clips don't get used by others, BRAND THEM, as i mentioned before, most clip making software also comes with a titling facility, just drag a logo all the way through the clip, put it in the corner like the MTV logo! That way people can't chop it of the start or the end! They can of course brand over it, but, how obvious would that look!

At the end of the day it is not really the wam bank that is to blame, it is those that are abusing it, however an e-mail to them would work so much better than this post, they have several moderators to sort this sort of thing out!

As with anything, people respond much better when e-mailed, rather than being publicly slagged off!

leonmoomin

In reply to Message (25562.2.1.1.1)

I agree...

By Andrew - Wed 01/11/06 10:12:16 GMT

Website:

The idea is very good. And you are probobly right, that the "owners" of clips are way beyond memory now. I sometimes tend to think it's still the Internet of the mid-90ies, with mostly free content and clear rights and rules. So my opinions are sometimes outdated.

Andrew.

In reply to Message (25562.2.1.1)

Re: Rudy, true, but...

By rudy - Wed 01/11/06 03:44:37 GMT

Website:

Ok, Andrew, I can follow your argumentation, but there are thousands of wetlook clips in

the world wide web. Nobody will be able to decide for every clip which person "the owner" is.

If any user has uploaded a clip which he did not produce, he has broken the rules.

What I wanted to say: this should be a discussion forum, not a platform for mountebanks.

I am absolutely sure that the Wambank manager will read these contributions and draw the

right conclusions.

The idea of sharing wetlook clips is new, it is good. And we should support people who

invest losts of money to make exchanging of wetlook stuff possible. I there are only

producers OR freebie hunters in the future, there will be no stuff we are able to exchange.

Maybe some clips were rejected erroneously. But this forum is a great chance that we

all can be producers AND freebie hunters.

In reply to Message (25562.2.1)

Rudy, true, but...

By Andrew - Wed 01/11/06 02:25:37 GMT

Website:

The Wambank is new, while clipe sharing free and pay sites are not. So over the years many people who haven't contributed ANYTHING to this community have accumulated numerous clips, produced by others. Both producers like Wetinred - with specialist sites or like Tom or JW - with free sites, or even those just sharing movies on Rapidshare, Myspace, Youtube etc. The problem with the WamBank is working on a "first come, first served" basis. So it doesn't really count, who made dthe clip, but who uploaded it first. So for instance: JW made a clip. gave it to us for free. Than someone uploaded JW's clip as his, got ANOTHER free clip for not his work and a few days later JW has his own clip rejected. That's a big flaw. And it may end in this way: noone anymore will give free clips. So IMHO for the WamBank to work nicely each clip should be checked with the well-known clip providers for years (there are not many of them) and if it is their clip it should not be accepted. The way it is now, the person who uses someone elses clip gets another one for free, the provider doesn't. That is highly unfair. And also tells us much about our community. I would never upload a clip not made by me to the WamBank - it would feel like stealing. Yet many people have no problem with it. Sad.

Andrew.

In reply to Message (25562.2)

Re: FORGET THE WAMBANK SITE

By rudy - Wed 01/11/06 01:26:22 GMT

Website:

Come on, guy !

I beg to differ. My experiences with the Wambank manager are excellent. Tell him your opinion, but do not shout !! Every

forum has its rules and you should accept them. Usually when the Wambank manager rejects a clip there are reasons.

Some of my clips were rejected, too. My next upload was o.k., so, where is your problem ????

I am happy that the Wambank offers rare clips which I can exchange with other people all over the world. You should be happy,

too, that there are people who are able to offer wetlook stuff. If all wetlook enthusiasts were freebie hunters only, you would not

have any stuff for exchanging.

It is your right to critisize others but you shoult not excoriate them ...

In reply to Message (25562)

FORGET THE WAMBANK SITE

By WETTERTHEBETTER - Tue 31/10/06 22:29:18 GMT

Website:

HELLO ALL

I ADDED 4 VIDEOS TO WAMBANK AND 3 OF THEM I TOOK MY SELF FROM THE ORIGINAL VIDEO.

ALL OF THEM ARE REJECTED BY WAMBANK WHAT THE FUCK ARE THEY DOING.

ACTUALLY I STARTED THE WHOLE CLIPS AND VIDEO SHARE ON THIS FORUM VIA "RAPIDSHARE"

BUT OK I WILL NEVER ADD A CLIP OR VIDEO ANYMORE ON THIS STUPID WAMBANK SITE

Report Abuse or Problem to Nigel at Minxmovies
If you enjoy this forum, then please make a small donation to help with running costs: (you can change amount)