Wetlook World Forum

Current time: Fri 26/04/24 14:45:44 GMT

Translate page FROM -> TO

Translate page TO <- FROM

Message # 21926.3.2.1.1

Subject: Re: Re: Re: Still pictures!

Date: Sat 22/04/06 07:52:57 GMT

Name: Rob

Email:

Website:

Report Abuse or Problem to Nigel at Minxmovies
If you enjoy this forum, then please make a small donation to help
with running costs: (you can change amount)

I still consider DVD quality as "low quality" compared to (good) still photos. That's what made me cancel my membership with some of those sites.. they had great outfits and great models, but unfortunately only as video clips (rather good quality, but still not good enough).

In reply to Message (21926.3.2.1)

Re: Re: Still pictures!

By Graham (Styx) - Fri 21/04/06 17:23:28 GMT

Website:

That's a very generalised statement.

Some websites specialise in producing high quality (DVD quality) videos, but they are not free.

And some are very low quality and not worth watching- some are free and some are not.

You need to shop around.

In reply to Message (21926.3.2)

Re: Still pictures!

By Wolfgang - Fri 21/04/06 11:45:42 GMT

Website:

That's the point!

Internet Videos are boring because of their really bad quality

Wolfgang

In reply to Message (21926.3)

Still pictures!

By Rob - Fri 21/04/06 06:41:51 GMT

Website:

Videos - even the ones made by professional - are still suffering from crappy resolution and really bad picture quality, even when compared to average quality still photos.

Additionally, I also like the way a still photo is capturing the moment.

In reply to Message (21926)

still photos or moving pictures? Preferances

By Arthur Chappell - arthur@chappell7300.freeserve.co.uk Fri 21/04/06 02:01:05 GMT

Website: http://www.shvoong.com/www/personal-sites/170646-minx-wetlook-forum/

I wonder whether wetlook enthusiasts prefer still pictures and photos to moving film imagery? I do, strangely, though nothing can compensate for being close to wetlook girls or actually in the water with them. The moving picture tends to take away an image as quickly as it arrives, while a still photo has a preserved timeless frozen preserved quality. I quite like to see an image and imagine the moves by which the girl or gilrs captured in the shot got to where they are, and what the next move will be. A girl floating on her back in the water for example - will she turn to float/swim facing forward - Will she swim/wade towards camera, or away - will she lower her feet and start to stand up - will a girl dive deeper or begin to rise from the water? What effect will the water have on her clothes, cleavage, hair next? Etc... The moving image takes that mystery and imagination away too soon. Be interesting to see how others feel on this too. AC

Report Abuse or Problem to Nigel at Minxmovies
If you enjoy this forum, then please make a small donation to help with running costs: (you can change amount)