Wetlook World Forum

Current time: Sat 27/04/24 05:08:14 GMT

Translate page FROM -> TO

Translate page TO <- FROM

Message # 18062.3

Subject: Re: All of this blather about underaged models

Date: Mon 05/09/05 08:30:20 GMT

Name: Wet Dude

Email:

Website:

Report Abuse or Problem to Nigel at Minxmovies
If you enjoy this forum, then please make a small donation to help
with running costs: (you can change amount)

One thing you have to remember here. Links to photos THAT ARE ALREADY ON THE INTERNET are what's being posted here. So the responsibility of appropriateness lies with the person that put the photos on the net, not the people who link to them here. I remember a debate here about the Olsen twins with a link to a Nickolodeon site with them getting slimed. But they hadn't yet reached their 18th birthday. SO WHAT!! The photos were already on the web, this site is just linking to them.

However on the debate of candid photos; No matter what age you are, if you are out having fun and someone snaps your photo, I'm not sure they would appreciate the photo being on the web, whether it's wetlook, innocent or whatever. Private citizens have a right to some privacy. Don't forget, legally, a model release must be signed for photos that show your face. Ever watch COPS on TV. People in the background often have blurred faces because those people didn't give consent to be shown on TV.

In reply to Message (18062)

All of this blather about underaged models

By Sopping - katakai1@verizon.net Mon 05/09/05 04:29:24 GMT

Website:

I don't get it.

I am not talking about national laws here, just common sense. It is OK to take and publish a picture of an infant, a young child, a lovely young woman---of ANY age...As long as she is, playing in the park, petting a small dog, sucking on an ice-cream bar, or sitting on a fence wearing a bikini etc etc. - whatever. No problem, no porn, no nothing.No cries of alarm!

Why can said young lady be innocently wading in a lake? Is it OK for her to be standing by the lake then? Or possibly just getting her feet wet? At what point does she wade to sufficient depth that the button of the "anti-porn police" is pushed?

There is not the slightest element of porn in these pictures.You know it, I know it, we all know it.

But, on this site, we have postings by slobbering voyeurs of "Busty,Sexy teen-models" and similar porn-come-ons all the time. Big time! If I were to waste my time on these sites, I am sure I could identify some underage bimbos. But why bother.

Report Abuse or Problem to Nigel at Minxmovies
If you enjoy this forum, then please make a small donation to help with running costs: (you can change amount)