Wetlook World ForumCurrent time: Fri 26/04/24 07:27:30 GMT |
Message # 17892.11.3 Subject: Re: Good pictures but your gf is ugly. Date: Mon 29/08/05 02:13:34 GMT Name: MaK |
Report Abuse or Problem to Nigel at Minxmovies
|
There have been several stupid and aggressive comments on this forum, but this one beats them all! What is the point of such a comment?
To my opinion the girl is nice and smiling. Perhaps a more feminine outfit and a little longer hair would suit her, but this is the old skirts/dresses/jeans discussion once again.
From a photographical point of view the pictures are only fair. There is a hard flashlight, and on most pictures the top of the head is missing, so I totally disagree with you - nice girl, but fair photographical technique.
-----------------------------------------------------------------
To the original poster from Sweden:
Forget the stupid comment. You have a nice girl, but maybe you need a little improvement on your photographical skills, but it is really much better than the other way around!
If you want inspiration for your next bathroom shots, please visit this link: http://www.onemodelplace.com/photographer_list.cfm?P_ID=4123 Scroll down to Lingerie and look at the second last picture in the left column. It is not pure wetlook, but there is so much story in this picture, that most photographers can learn a lot from this. Although it is absolute world class even a pro can fail a little. If he had looked more carefully through the viewer before shooting he would have discovered the TV-set in the background and covered it with a curtain, so don't be too embarrassed over your cropped heads.
|
In reply to Message (17892.11) Good pictures but your gf is ugly. [nt]
By wetbob - Sun 28/08/05 05:41:49 GMT (no text) |
In reply to Message (17892) right link!
By Anonymous - Sat 27/08/05 14:43:10 GMT http://community.webshots.com/user/putte76100 |
Report Abuse or Problem to Nigel at Minxmovies
If you enjoy this forum, then please make a small donation to help with running costs:
(you can change amount)
|
[ This page took 0.019 seconds to generate ]