Wetlook World ForumCurrent time: Tue 07/05/24 21:18:11 GMT |
Message # 54957.1 Subject: Re:question about wetlook in public places - underage kids in the shot Date: Sun 15/07/12 14:46:03 GMT Name: AnthonyX Email: anthonyx@jowc.net |
Report Abuse or Problem to Nigel at Minxmovies
|
Someone will always complain. The question is: does it matter?
Personally, I don't think it matters if there is a kid incidentally visible in frame far off in the background, having nothing to do with the foreground subject (you) or the action. Ideally, it would be best if there was noone else in the shot, or at least no children discernible, but that can be hard to achieve in a public setting, so we have to accept some sort of compromise. |
In reply to Message (54957) question about wetlook in public places - underage kids in the shot
By Jessica - friends@fantasystockings.com Sun 15/07/12 09:50:18 GMT Website: http://fantasywetlook.com// www.fantasywetlook.com This question is mainly for wetlook producers.
I did a photoshoot at a public beach, fully clothed in the water. However, there was a kid running around behind me and there are some shots where you can see him. Do you think people will complain about it?
I've seen people complain about underage stuff before.
Thanks!
(the shoot that I am referring to is the blue stockings and red dress series that you can find in the Photo section of my blog, I posted it yesterday on this forum already. Now I am working on the video.)
Jessica http://fantasystockings.com/ / www.fantasystockings.com
|
Report Abuse or Problem to Nigel at Minxmovies
If you enjoy this forum, then please make a small donation to help with running costs:
(you can change amount)
|
[ This page took 0.128 seconds to generate ]