Wetlook World ForumCurrent time: Sat 27/04/24 21:30:45 GMT |
Message # 29490.1 Subject: Both Date: Fri 01/06/07 09:33:09 GMT Name: soggybottom |
Report Abuse or Problem to Nigel at Minxmovies
|
I was married to a woman for 18 years. For much of that time I had her convinced to perform wet most of the time. It REALLY excited me. After I was divorced I was with a woman for many years who would get wet for me most of the time. Again, it helped my PERFORMANCE tremendously.
Then you get old and body parts "fall off". She lost all interest in wetlook. As years advanced I developed "problems". Ever smoke? If you did or do, be prepaired! Even the little blue pill may not help. To me sex is not a spectator sport. And wetlook is mostly about sex. Now that I am older I can mostly only be a spectator. But I still get very excited about wetlook. |
In reply to Message (29490) Charis' question
By A Stranger in Warsaw - Fri 01/06/07 09:14:51 GMT I just now read the poll question (29373)-- and there weren't very many answers, but I think it would be interesting to have more responses. So I'd like to restart it. The question was if you prefer passive wetlook, or active wetlook? I think avid forum readers know I'm active, though frustratedly so. And I also enjoy some pictures-- so a and b are my answers. Some lucky respondents below mentioned being wet _with_ women. Boy, sure wish I could enjoy that more often... But in real life, I have only been close enough to a woman in wet clothes to get the full visual effect that a picture allows just a few times. And I think it's interesting (though I'll allow that not all readers will) that the fun is sometimes what I enjoy, not the sexual pleasure. YouTubes are just fun for me, maybe because of the lack of quality video.
|
Report Abuse or Problem to Nigel at Minxmovies
If you enjoy this forum, then please make a small donation to help with running costs:
(you can change amount)
|
[ This page took 0.016 seconds to generate ]