Wetlook World Forum

Current time: Sat 04/05/24 08:56:52 GMT

Translate page FROM -> TO

Translate page TO <- FROM

Message # 81429.6.1.1

Subject: Re:producers pictures!

Date: Sun 24/05/20 03:27:24 GMT

Name: EdR

Email: asplashofglamour@gmail.com

Website: https://www.asplashofglamour.com/ / asplashofglamour.com

Report Abuse or Problem to Nigel at Minxmovies
If you enjoy this forum, then please make a small donation to help
with running costs: (you can change amount)

I’m not really expecting anything, but we wouldn’t mind a bit of feedback.

I can understand the comparison to Wetfoto in terms of photo quality but I think we are very different and not often mentioned, so I was just curious what the op (or anyone else) thought about us.

Sincerely EdR

In reply to Message (81429.6.1)

Re:producers pictures!

By Oldbeewet - Sat 23/05/20 15:23:45 GMT

Website:

What answer do you expect?

Obviously you are a professionell photographer using professional equipment and working with professionell models. To me, you are similar to Wetfoto, but he has a different style, buts works on a similar professional level.

In reply to Message (81429.6)

Re:producers pictures!

By EdR - asplashofglamour@gmail.com Sat 23/05/20 14:42:02 GMT

Website: https://www.asplashofglamour.com// asplashofglamour.com

I’m curious. What do you think of asplashofglamour.com ? We primarily do wetlook photography

EdwinR

In reply to Message (81429)

producers pictures!

By Anonymous - Fri 22/05/20 17:05:41 GMT

Website:

Producers photo review.

Please keep in mind that I don't want to disencourage any producer, I only investigated briefly the pictures and made a list with some experiences.

Eurowam

1200x1600

72 dpi

Overal lightning ok, sharp, correcty white balance,

focus is ok, also uses low f-stop from time to time to emphases the subject,

correctly edited pictures.

Only some higher resultion can be appriciated.

Wetlooker

1950x1303

72 dpi

Lighted by harsh flash, whitebalance differs from picture to picture (clothes can change color before being wet). I doubt if there is any editing here.

some rubish pictures with closed eyes and incorrect focus are also in the list. Less could be more ...

Erik

1202x1800

240 dpi

Pictures are sharp and correctly focused, shots portrait most of time. Also uses a save F-stop

to control sharpness. Whitebalance is ok in the whole set.

the dpi allows you to enlarge the pictures

waminstyle

1373x2064

96 dpi

Sometimes I am confused about the focus point, some harsh shadows. Lightning could be better. Whitebalance

is correct.

very uncommon resolution though

Wamderland

2700x1800

72dpi

These are snapshots. There is actually no real style to comment here. I don't think that the foto's

are edited in some way. Mostly distubed by the unbalanced horizon.

wetfoto

3240x2160

300 dpi

Light is sometimes bit overdone with loose of some detail, whitebalance is correct and pictures are in focus.

Highest pictures quality of all.

Report Abuse or Problem to Nigel at Minxmovies
If you enjoy this forum, then please make a small donation to help with running costs: (you can change amount)