Wetlook World ForumCurrent time: Thu 02/05/24 23:12:18 GMT |
Message # 69271.4 Subject: Interesting question.... Date: Fri 13/01/17 22:11:29 GMT Name: jollywetfellow |
Report Abuse or Problem to Nigel at Minxmovies
|
I have made some scathing comments about 'dudeophobes' in the past; the way some people go on you would think that:
a. they themselves are throwbacks to the bad old days of the 1950s when homosexuality was seen as unnatural; and b. the sexual orientation police are looking over their shoulder whenever they're online, ready to brand them forever as gay should they look at one single picture of a man (well, I suppose the way cookies work is a bit spooky.....).
But I do think you are exaggerating a bit, Mikey, in two opposite ways: 1. The majority of candid wetlook vids include males as well as females, yet complaints about that are rare; 2. By no means all other (non-wetlook) sex imagery includes males - I'm no great expert on non-wetlook porn, but even I am aware of endless pics and vids of twerking booties, bouncing boobs, women in different fetish outfits, women in underwear, naked women, women pissing, women humping poles, etc etc; all intended to be sexually arousing and all with no man present. In fact, I would guess that the majority of sexual imagery, which does not involve the sex act itself, does not have a man present. Of course, you can't portray actual (heterosexual) sex without both sexes being present. So is it perhaps the case that men are only present in sex vids when they are indispensable for what is being portrayed?
Taking 1 and 2 together - perhaps porn users only tolerate men when they are a necessary part of the action, they prefer women-only imagery otherwise? Perhaps this applies equally to wetlookers and others, but it is more obvious with wetlook since wetlook is all about how a woman looks, and not at all about actual sex? Just a thought..... |
In reply to Message (69271) Why do wetlook fans hate mixed couples??
By Mikey - Fri 13/01/17 18:53:39 GMT I've been wondering for a while now. Most porn stuff contains actors of both genders. Wetlook is not porn, but it's a fetish. Yet both male wetlook fans as female or gay wetlook fans (whoever buys male wetlook) seem to hate mixed couples
There is one wetlook couple site online. And Wetlooker.com has some mixed couple sets dubbed "lovestory" - and these are the only sets which always have more dislikes than likes, even if they are great quality with beautiful people. Even Tainster seems to separate wetlook from other genres and keeps it all girl, while most of their other stuff is mainly mixed.
So why is that, that wetlook fans dislike mixed couple content? Does this come with our specific fetish? I never quite understood it. And yes, I know that among the mainstream erotica lovers there are those who like only lesbian or single girl stuff, but still, among wetlookers this seems to by a way bigger group, a 99% majority... Why?
Sorry if this question bores you, but I've always wondered...
|
Report Abuse or Problem to Nigel at Minxmovies
If you enjoy this forum, then please make a small donation to help with running costs:
(you can change amount)
|
[ This page took 0.008 seconds to generate ]