Wetlook World ForumCurrent time: Wed 08/05/24 05:33:15 GMT |
Message # 28996.3.1.1.1.2.1 Subject: Re: Date: Fri 11/05/07 22:31:30 GMT Name: MG |
Report Abuse or Problem to Nigel at Minxmovies
|
So Rob you think I am an idiot. Yet you have never met me. Perhaps I am for even answering your idiot post. Well one thing I am, is a man who believes that people do not deserve exploitation of something as sacred as baptism by you and others, and bragging about it on this forum..For sexual gratification.! If that makes me an idiot then so be it. But what are you??? And as for what I have contributed to this and other forums is not for you to know.!! Don't accuse me of being a loafer cause you don't have a f...clue what you are talking about. |
In reply to Message (28996.3.1.1.1.2) Re:
By Rob - Fri 11/05/07 04:31:06 GMT Don't let you get down by some intolerant idiots! I think there are still much more people enjoying your (and others) posts than those who aren't. The problem ist, like on most forums - the vast majority just grabs the freebies and never posts anything, while a few others keep complaining and are uncomfortable with everything they see. |
In reply to Message (28996.3.1.1.1) Re:
By Wetdreams - learjet66@hotmail.com Thu 10/05/07 21:18:10 GMT "I just wanted to say it because they are on a forum that I visit often"
Yes well this forum has gone that way lately. No religious pictures, check. No whales, check. No old women, check. No candid pics, check. No SC girls, check. It's getting harder to post anything around here without being pounced on.
Up until now I've refused to be sucked into a debate about it. I don't know why I'm bothering now! As long as it's not illegal let everyone be.
So after testing the water, I find it too icy. This is my last post on the matter. I will not contribute or comment further. |
In reply to Message (28996.3.1.1) Re:
By MG - Thu 10/05/07 19:30:57 GMT Wetdreams said..."Let's step back a minute and remember that wet clothes as a sex fetish is not generally accepted by the general public. Many don't understand it at all and even frown apon it. Careful when throwing stones from a glass house."
I have no problem at all telling anyone that I find wetclothes on a woman sexy.And to be truthful I have never been frowned upon for that.At least not in person. I do not think it is right to place pics of someone on the net without their consent. But that has all been hashed over before. If I do not like that then it is my choice not to go to those sites that host these kinds of pics. I do not think I live in a "glass" house nor am I throwing stones. As I wrote earlier I believe posting Baptism pics in a sexual context is wrong. I do not expect anyone will change their mind and stop posting them. I just wanted to say it because they are on a forum that I visit often.I don't have to look at them. So do what you want but I will continue to keep my wet clothes fetish away from baptism. And no one will ever convince me that it is right either.
|
In reply to Message (28996.3.1) Re: Best Baptism picture ever
By Wetdreams - learjet66@hotmail.com Thu 10/05/07 15:05:23 GMT I can understand where your coming from. Perhaps it is lack of respect from me to post these links, as these images will be taken in a sexual context by some, including me. But do we not do the same with links to youtube and other photo hosts from the general public with their innocent pictures of women getting wet in clothes? How would the people that uploaded pictures of their friends, the pushing a girl into a pool type pictures, the water ride pictures, the ocean swim pictures, most candid wetlook infact, feel if they knew there was a group of people out there with a wet clothes fetish that were getting off from these pics and posting links to a forum?
Let's step back a minute and remember that wet clothes as a sex fetish is not generally accepted by the general public. Many don't understand it at all and even frown apon it. Careful when throwing stones from a glass house.
I know there is a sub group of wetlook enthusiasts that especially like Baptism photos and videos, and I know we are generally not accepted by some even in a wetlook community that is not accepted by the general public! How underground do we have to go?
Morally wrong? In Muslim countries it is morally wrong to hug a woman or kiss her on the cheek in public. Such outrageous acts of immorality! Okay, now I'm probably just trying to justify a fetish.
I grew up in a church that practises full immersion baptism. Perhaps that's where all this started. The baptism font had a clear glass window so we could see the candidates going under the water. Being in my teens and with hormones running wild, those women that were slowly submerged (we had a pastor that did it very slow) started to lok a bit too good. You could see their hair slowly go from dry to the beautiful flowing style underwater (underwater sub fetish) to wet and clingy (wet hair sub fetish) as they came up out of the water. Often these were the same girls that caught my attention previous times while waiting for the sometimes very boring sermon to end. Somehow, not even of my choosing, the local pastor enlisted me to video baptisms for him. I think I always had a wetlook fetish, but this just fanned the fire. At first I fought it, getting turned on by wet women in church in a religious context seemed wrong. I realise now I can't change who I am. Over the years I turned agnostic, for reasons I won't go into. In this light these pictures are guilt free wetlook. Now if there is a God and he turns out to be Baptist then I'm doomed! But I very much doubt it somehow.
Anyway, I'm just testing the water, so to speak. If there is sufficient opposition to Baptism links being posted for whatever reason I will refrain in the future and keep them to myself. |
In reply to Message (28996.3) Re: Best Baptism picture ever
By MG - Wed 09/05/07 20:19:47 GMT Baptism pictures posted for a sexual nature make me very uncomfortable. We all come from different religions and beliefs that is true but I believe it is morally wrong to post these pictures for obviously the wrong reasons.That is not for which they were intended. True I don't have to look at them,which I don't. But...they are posted on a forum I visit frequently.Therefore I am a part of it in a way. To me they take away from the innocence of pictures of people enjoying their wetlook. I find it in bad taste and morally wrong. But hey that is just my opinion. For some reason I just had to say it. MG |
In reply to Message (28996) Best Baptism picture ever
By Wetdreams - learjet66@hotmail.com Wed 09/05/07 08:22:33 GMT Website: http://www.smugmug.com/gallery/1825722#91292217 Absolutely beautiful. High resolution, you can see every drop of water. Clinging and water streaming off all over. The expression on her face is excellent. The whole thing is so beautiful it almost makes me want to go back to church. But that probably wouldn't work as it would be for all the wrong reasons. I'd just go to see the baptisms.
We need a wetlook church. Baptisms every week in our Sunday best. We can each take turns at dunking.
|
Report Abuse or Problem to Nigel at Minxmovies
If you enjoy this forum, then please make a small donation to help with running costs:
(you can change amount)
|
[ This page took 0.002 seconds to generate ]