Wetlook World Forum

Current time: Sat 27/04/24 21:10:31 GMT

Translate page FROM -> TO

Translate page TO <- FROM

Message # 21926.6.1

Subject: Re: Identify videos please

Date: Sat 22/04/06 00:51:49 GMT

Name: Arthur Chappell

Email: arthur@chappell7300.freeserve.co.uk

Website:

Report Abuse or Problem to Nigel at Minxmovies
If you enjoy this forum, then please make a small donation to help
with running costs: (you can change amount)

Some interesting feedback here, as well as a few flme bits at the start - - Though I prefer stills, I do like videos and DVD's, especially the Minx material available right here - of which I have some, and two more on order already - I also like literary descriptions of wetlook experiences and fantasies - Yes, with DVD you can pause/freeze frame etc, though you do already know the story as far as it is shown before the moment where you freeze things, - A picture has a greater air of mystery to that aspect of it - - another nice area is a series of photos of the same girl(s), where there has been some movement, especially increaaed amount of wetness, or a move deeper into the pool, river, under the shower, hose etc, where you can imagine the movement made between that and the previous shot, and if you know that there are more, to come you can get a mental picture of how far or not the models may have gone before you download or scroll to it.... I t creates a depth of voyeuroism and reflection I think film tends to take away - but that doesn't stop good film having an aesthetic merit of its own - again I reccomend Minx - (Do I get a discount for the free advertising? Only joking - Lol)

In reply to Message (21926.6)

Identify videos please

By Anonymous - Fri 21/04/06 20:23:52 GMT

Website:

Some of us are still so primitive that we're using dial-up. Please have mercy on us and indicate with an icon or in the subject line when you are linking to video.

In reply to Message (21926)

still photos or moving pictures? Preferances

By Arthur Chappell - arthur@chappell7300.freeserve.co.uk Fri 21/04/06 02:01:05 GMT

Website: http://www.shvoong.com/www/personal-sites/170646-minx-wetlook-forum/

I wonder whether wetlook enthusiasts prefer still pictures and photos to moving film imagery? I do, strangely, though nothing can compensate for being close to wetlook girls or actually in the water with them. The moving picture tends to take away an image as quickly as it arrives, while a still photo has a preserved timeless frozen preserved quality. I quite like to see an image and imagine the moves by which the girl or gilrs captured in the shot got to where they are, and what the next move will be. A girl floating on her back in the water for example - will she turn to float/swim facing forward - Will she swim/wade towards camera, or away - will she lower her feet and start to stand up - will a girl dive deeper or begin to rise from the water? What effect will the water have on her clothes, cleavage, hair next? Etc... The moving image takes that mystery and imagination away too soon. Be interesting to see how others feel on this too. AC

Report Abuse or Problem to Nigel at Minxmovies
If you enjoy this forum, then please make a small donation to help with running costs: (you can change amount)