Wetlook World ForumCurrent time: Thu 28/03/24 23:24:10 GMT |
Message # 9300.2 Subject: Re: Additions to rules - candid and partial nudity Date: Mon 22/03/04 20:06:34 GMT Name: Wetlongskirts Email: elgol@gmx.co.uk |
Report Abuse or Problem to Nigel at Minxmovies
|
I'm confused about No.9 - how can full nudity ever be regarded as wetlook? Wet skin isn't part of the definition of wetlook, surely?
As far as No.8 goes, it doesn't unambiguously clear up whether taking photos of people in a public place without their knowledge (either of the picture being taken or what it's going to be used for) is regarded as being an invasion of their privacy. From the example you've given, I suspect you regard photos taken in public places as being acceptable, but I think you should explicitly state that. |
In reply to Message (9300) Additions to rules - candid and partial nudity
By Nigel - nigel@Wetlook.com Mon 22/03/04 18:49:00 GMT Website: www.wetlook.com Following some recent issues in the forum, I have added the following to the "Wetlook Definitions and Rules of Acceptability and Behavior" section of the rules:
2 Acceptable images are those from modelled situations and candid (Webster's Definition: photography of subjects acting naturally or spontaneously without being posed)
8 No images which are an invasion of privacy (e.g. shot through your neighbour's window while they are taking a bath).
9 Links to images that contain full or paritial nudity are acceptable, providing there is some wetlook, but the message should contain a warning of this.
10 Links here are generally to wetlook females, you can also post links to male wetlook, but these should be clearly marked, "Male Wetlook" or "For the ladies" etc.
Nigel
|
Report Abuse or Problem to Nigel at Minxmovies
If you enjoy this forum, then please make a small donation to help with running costs:
(you can change amount)
|
[ This page took 0.011 seconds to generate ]