Wetlook World ForumCurrent time: Thu 25/04/24 15:44:27 GMT |
Message # 78174.5.1.1.1 Subject: ....but it goes both ways Date: Mon 19/08/19 16:15:22 GMT Name: MK Email: wamtec@comcast.net |
Report Abuse or Problem to Nigel at Minxmovies
|
yeah...but the example quoted by Breaking News was an example of a female who is denigrating a male. So this proves that using condescending language goes both ways, because there are also female content producers who use inappropriate language to denigrate males as well.
Ultimately the Forum Rule 2.9 states
"2.9 No links to Explicit or 'Hard Core Porno' sites, unless they contain significant wetlook content, these should be clearly marked as "Nudity", "Porn" or "XXX". "
So, wetlook porn postings are permitted on this forum, but the posters of such items are not always following forum etiquette that requires all such postings be highlighted appropriately in the title prefix or suffix.
I have suggested to he Forum owner many times over the last 10 years that there should be a "XXX" message icon (which we currently do not have) so that all XXX postings can be marked, and the forum should have a filter where readers can filter out all such XXX postings, so they will not see those items. I also suggested a separate section for "Producer Commercials" or a filter whereby all producers use a special icon and a filter so that readers can filter out all producer postings etc, so readers can create a "safe space" and not have to see producer commercials.
I have suggested all this many times in the last 10 years, but the forum owner does not wish to add these features .... so if you want to have "safe space" features added to this forum, you need to lobby the forum owner, because I have been suggesting this for 10 years and the forum owner does not wish to change his forum.
But you have to see the funny side of this ... the same female poster who was denigrating males also said the girl had "elastic breasts". I fell off ,my chair laughing because if that is true she should be on the Ripley's Believe It or Not website.
MK
|
In reply to Message (78174.5.1.1) Thanks for the feedback - glad it’s not just me [nt]
By TrickTrev - Mon 19/08/19 06:51:04 GMT (no text) |
In reply to Message (78174.5.1) Uh.... I don't think this is a language barrier problem...
By Breaking News - Sun 18/08/19 22:23:03 GMT From post 78171
"I also like to feel the wet jeans fabric on my skin and my ass and it turns me on that you're now going to jerk off your loser dick. Begin! You may jerk off for me and my jeans ass as it's getting wetter and wetter! But you have to wait until I allow you to cum"
language barrier?!? |
In reply to Message (78174.5) Re:Anyone else fed up with the way women are described in some posts?
By Yawned - Sun 18/08/19 16:40:30 GMT It is gross. and to add to the sexualizing, the posts from Wamtec and Ariel, though they are often old, are nothing more than clothes hastily thrown on, and stripped off. Nothing more than porn. Worthless. |
In reply to Message (78174) Anyone else fed up with the way women are described in some posts?
By TrickyTrev - Sun 18/08/19 10:21:25 GMT I know I'm probably going to get lots of negatives for this post, but I wondered what others' views are? There seems to be an increasing amount of "This hot chick" and "slim girl" and "these girls love to get wet" kind of posts. I've been into wetlook as long as I can remember, and for me I love the whole thing of women enjoying having a laugh whilst getting wet. For me Leonmoomin is a perfect example. It's not sexual, it's fun - and that makes it sexy.
Of late there seems to be an increased churn of over emphasised sexual posts where it looks to be overly sexual, slightly derogatory to women, and more pornhub talk than wetlook. These "girls" should have some respect attached to them!
Sorry for the rant, just wondered if I'm getting too old and set in my ways.
Leonmoomin - you're a hero
|
Report Abuse or Problem to Nigel at Minxmovies
If you enjoy this forum, then please make a small donation to help with running costs:
(you can change amount)
|
[ This page took 0.030 seconds to generate ]