Wetlook World Forum

Current time: Thu 18/04/24 14:49:59 GMT

Translate page FROM -> TO

Translate page TO <- FROM

Message # 7448.1.1

Subject: Re: Submerged look vs. wetlook

Date: Mon 15/12/03 05:37:31 GMT

Name: JS

Email:

Website:

Report Abuse or Problem to Nigel at Minxmovies
If you enjoy this forum, then please make a small donation to help
with running costs: (you can change amount)

I see what you mean,if only she had waded back out. There are recent videos by Michelle Branch,Beonce Knowles, and Mariah Carey with limited wetlook from a distance. The best I can remember is Madonna from her early years in a video I believe called Cherish where she rolled around in the ocean surf. If anyone knows of others let me know.

In reply to Message (7448.1)

Submerged look vs. wetlook

By Frankie - Mon 15/12/03 05:01:12 GMT

Website:

I viewed the video and it brings up an interesting point. Is it really considered wetlook when the subject is submerging herself, yet she is still completely dry while the wet portion of her is underwater and out of site? Theoretically, as we view the clip, her clothes are always dry. The only way it would be wetlook is when she emerges from the water or the shots are views with an underwater camera. Does this make sense?

In reply to Message (7448)

Wetlook Music Videos

By JS - Mon 15/12/03 04:36:12 GMT

Website:

I just ran across a music video by Liz Phair,there are a couple of brief scenes where she is playing a guitar while standing in a pond in jeans and slowely she gets deeper all the way up to her neck,you can view the whole video on her web site "www.lizphair.com" and click on videos,it is the last one from 1993 called Never Said

Report Abuse or Problem to Nigel at Minxmovies
If you enjoy this forum, then please make a small donation to help with running costs: (you can change amount)