Wetlook World Forum

Current time: Thu 18/04/24 03:15:01 GMT

Translate page FROM -> TO

Translate page TO <- FROM

Message # 66567.8.1.1

Subject: Re:Wetlooker: some conclusions and a little compliment!

Date: Tue 09/02/16 23:29:54 GMT

Name: Aristos

Email: maxiaristos@gmail.com

Website:

Report Abuse or Problem to Nigel at Minxmovies
If you enjoy this forum, then please make a small donation to help
with running costs: (you can change amount)

Yep, looks like photoprapher and videographer are the same person.

Basically, it is only a behind the scenes video, not a dedicated wetlook video. When both video and pics should be done in parallel then you need a second person. Or the same person alternates taking pics and making video. But this again requires the models to repeat some movements, i.e. exiting the pool. That's not possible in 8 minutes total shooting time...

In reply to Message (66567.8.1)

Re:Wetlooker: some conclusions and a little compliment!

By waterman - Tue 09/02/16 21:43:25 GMT

Website:

Answer to question 1): the photographer! You can conclude from the perspectives of the photos.

The general mistake was to put up a light at a very low vantage point.

For me it looks as if videographer and photographer are one person. The camera was simply put on a tripod overlooking most of the scene area. Sometimes in between the photographer takes a look at the videocamera and changes viewing angle if neccessary. These are the moments, too, which on the other hand are missing in the images (for instance when the first girl left the water).

Sorry again: That's no successful concept. So think it over again and improve.

In reply to Message (66567.8)

Re:Wetlooker: some conclusions and a little compliment!

By Ytsen - Tue 09/02/16 20:15:12 GMT

Website: http://wetlookthailand.net/

Thanks for the gift of the distributed pics and film.

The pictures show somehow an improvement coming from better illumination of the scene.

But the film is a good example how filming should not be done.

1. Sorry to say, "Which idiot is constantly running around producing shades on the scene and on the models?"

2. When the girls are in the pool, the camera is completely running out of focus.

The cameraman is no professional and has to be trained to do commercial films. Amateurs are not requested to do pay films.

Absolute discipline has to be obeyed on the set.

Means planing and accuracy and not as fast as possible to get the maximum of shots.

In reply to Message (66567)

Wetlooker: some conclusions and a little compliment!

By Dima - Tue 09/02/16 10:38:40 GMT

Website: http://wetlooker.com/

Thank you so much for all your reviews!

It's an important call to change something in wetlooker.com.

We have started to improve our shooting session right today, but it need a patience (because a lot of sets already shooted and uploaded).

As a complimentary for all your suggestions and reviews, please download one free set with video from our recent session:

https://dropmefiles.com/Fg3os (it will be available only 7 days)

Hope, you will enjoy it.

I have try to summarize roadmap of future development:

- technical quality: light, blur, post-production

- more different model's poses, less same type series of shots, different shooting angles, attention to exits from water

- more enjoyment and emotions

- no smoking, less ripping

- duration of video

- add different outfits: dresses, skirts, pantyhoses

- more different shoes (heels, ked and vans, sneakers, not only socks)

- affordable price policy

What else?

Thank you again!

Some preview photos of free set:

Report Abuse or Problem to Nigel at Minxmovies
If you enjoy this forum, then please make a small donation to help with running costs: (you can change amount)