Wetlook World Forum

Current time: Thu 18/04/24 20:10:56 GMT

Translate page FROM -> TO

Translate page TO <- FROM

Message # 66561.4.1.1.1

Subject: Re:my small contribution

Date: Mon 08/02/16 19:59:50 GMT

Name: Dima

Email:

Website:

Report Abuse or Problem to Nigel at Minxmovies
If you enjoy this forum, then please make a small donation to help
with running costs: (you can change amount)

Thank you SBF for your review again.

Your review about "missing opportunities" is a most strong motivation for us, that we ever have got.

We will continue to increase quality and more work with photographers)

In reply to Message (66561.4.1.1)

Re:my small contribution

By sunboyfun - sunboyfun@gmail.com Mon 08/02/16 17:14:08 GMT

Website: creativewetlook.com

I am also glad many others have expressed opinions regarding the Wetlooker products. I have many times aired my views. I do understand that Dima's back catalog might still be in rotation and that maybe (and hopefully) newer sets will reflect suggested changes. That said, it is good to remind Dima that the suggestions would be EASY to put into action. I think the stable of both female and male models are excellent and with a bit of proper instruction on the shoots, as well as simple changes by the photographers could yield much better results. Some sets have a few real winners among the multitudes of redundant and uninteresting poses. The emerging shots on the pool ladders just as the model exits the water fresh, seem to hold the greatest promise. The endless still-frame-of video shots of a model's head above the water after one solitary dive into the pool, moving to the ladder simply wastes opportunity and is the crux of the quantity vs quality issue. I would rather buy 20 excellent pics than 200 mediocre ones. The scenes in the multi-colored pool area with the blue white and orange tiles (lots of duo or group shots taken there) seem to be of the worst quality, with blurry non-focus and bad lighting. Often the lamps themselves intrude on the shots. I realize it is a pool and not a studio, but the photographer should keep those objects in mind as the shoot is underway. Too much cookie-cutting mass production. Stick with the good things that work. I have little complaint about the outfits - most of the jeans the models wear look wonderful, especially if the lighting is good.

I do think the pricing is high for the videos, considering the minimal length and quality.

Best wishes.

SBF

In reply to Message (66561.4.1)

Re:my small contribution

By Dima - Mon 08/02/16 16:14:31 GMT

Website:

It is strange, by I am agree with you!

I love wetlook for a long time, but there is an understanding distance or barrier between me and our photographers, and between them and models.

I hardly try to change their interpretations, make some experiments.

In reply to Message (66561.4)

my small contribution

By plonss - Mon 08/02/16 16:08:19 GMT

Website:

I am happy Slawomirro that you brought up the subject again.

It was discussed before, but not much did change. I feel a pity for the girls, who are wetting themselves for nothing.

My most important clue to this is that the producer himself it not in wetlook, and does not understand what it is about....

Simply to understand if comparing with some other producers like Erik Elsas, UFA, Eurowam, wam photography etc (the list is far from complete, I know)

If had the same feeling that the producer did not understand the essence of wetlook with wetfoto in the beginning, but Victor learned and he distinguishes himself by superb photography...

In reply to Message (66561)

A little review about wetlooker.com

By Slawomirro - Mon 08/02/16 11:05:39 GMT

Website:

wetlooker.com

The same sneakers, simmilar clothes.

I think that a producer have sneakers and clothes for girls.

Very often girls in a next set has wet underwear and hair on dry clothes.

It's mean, new sets are shot one after one.

I bought 7-8 sets. Some photos are a blur, many photos are upload horizontaly,

not vertically. EXIF exist, so for example, from start to end, a whole one set was made in 10-12 minutes.

quantity not quality... it is a motto for wetlooker.com

Some people are very angry for wetlooker.com because wetlook sites like eewetlook.com, eurowam.com, mostwam.com, ect. accustomed us for a quality.

Report Abuse or Problem to Nigel at Minxmovies
If you enjoy this forum, then please make a small donation to help with running costs: (you can change amount)