Wetlook World Forum

Current time: Fri 19/04/24 04:45:33 GMT

Translate page FROM -> TO

Translate page TO <- FROM

Message # 65266.2.1.1

Subject: ssshhhh!

Date: Thu 17/09/15 13:07:14 GMT

Name: jollywetfellow

Email:

Website:

Report Abuse or Problem to Nigel at Minxmovies
If you enjoy this forum, then please make a small donation to help
with running costs: (you can change amount)

I don't think we want wetlook defined as porn, do we - otherwise I, X_wet_X, and numerous others would be obliged to restrict access to our Flickr, etc, pics! Anyway, the OED definition of pornography is

"Printed or visual material containing the explicit description or display of sexual organs or activity, intended to stimulate sexual excitement"

Whilst the last 5 words do support RoscoeBC's definition, the rest doesn't. Phew!

In reply to Message (65266.2.1)

Re:Lack of Wetlook in Porn

By RoscoeBC - marty.hewes@gmail.com Thu 17/09/15 05:47:19 GMT

Website:

That is a good, but probably unanswerable question, defining porn has always been problematic. I'd say no. By definition, I don't think porn requires nudity, only the intent of sexual stimulation on the part of the observer. I may be off base, but I'd define pornography as graphic art that is meant to sexually stimulate, in which case in my opinion, wetlook is pornography, at least for us. I know it doesn't need to be rated X to stimulate me :). A hot babe in a silk blouse, a mini, stockings and heels, teasing me, getting soaked, her clothes getting clingy and see through, panties still on, is much better porn for me than some girl stripping off and giving me an anatomy lesson. I'm not 16 years old, it's the tease and the suspense that generates the excitement. If I needed an anatomy lesson, I've seen enough already, there is enough of that around, I know where the parts are, half the people in the world have them, that's not art.

In reply to Message (65266.2)

Re:Lack of Wetlook in Porn

By Doug Dressplash - dougdresstwosplash@gmail.com Thu 17/09/15 03:52:56 GMT

Website:

umm,.. aren't wetlook and pornography two separate things?

I mean, wetlook CAN be used as a prelude to nudity and pornography,

or it can be enjoyed with the subject fully clothed throughout the photo and/or video shoot.

In reply to Message (65266)

Lack of Wetlook in Porn

By Anonymous - Wed 16/09/15 14:58:48 GMT

Website:

It seems over the last year or so there has been a substantial lack of wetlook in porn videos. I really enjoy porn videos that are not intended to be wetlook but wetlook seems to somehow happen. Most of the ones I see now days are the same videos that have been circling around the web for years. Does anybody know where to find or search for wetlook porn videos?

Report Abuse or Problem to Nigel at Minxmovies
If you enjoy this forum, then please make a small donation to help with running costs: (you can change amount)