Wetlook World ForumCurrent time: Fri 29/03/24 16:54:28 GMT |
Message # 6377.4 Subject: Re: Why is it? Informal=casual Date: Tue 14/10/03 02:09:13 GMT Name: Sopping |
Report Abuse or Problem to Nigel at Minxmovies
|
I have expressed these thoughts before, so save your flames.
I intensely dislike stockings and garter belts on models. To me, they are indicative of showgirls pole-dancing; heel-kicking on the chorus line; and, based on news photos, the outfits worn by local prostitutes in at least NYC, Chicago, and Washington. Thank heavens they are more or less passe.
On the other hand, the casual outfits, worn by girls who are wading in fountains, streams, the sea etc (sometimes barefoot) are, to me enticing and sexy. In short, a gal at the edge of a body of water may decide to wade and then get wet. If she were rigged in a more formal outfit, she would be less likely to do so.
The models I have photographed throughout the years typically have worn skirts and blouses, dresses,sundresses, pants and tops, and sometimes shirts and shorts. Those whom I have candidly photographed wading and getting wet, have been in similar outfits.
And certainly the gals in long summer dresses, photographed in fountains by Eric and Leonomin (including LU in a long dress) are really terrific. And sexy to a fare-the-well.
Let's keep it that way.!
S: |
In reply to Message (6377) Why is it?
By clockwork - clockwork@yahoo.com Mon 13/10/03 05:52:05 GMT What is with this new "trend" that girls don't wear pantyhose/stockings while getting wet anymore. I've been on this forum for 3 years now, and all I've been seeing is less "dressy" outfits and more jeans/t-shirt outfits.....with sandals. Let's get some more "formal and dressy" pics and articles here.
Later
|
Report Abuse or Problem to Nigel at Minxmovies
If you enjoy this forum, then please make a small donation to help with running costs:
(you can change amount)
|
[ This page took 0.029 seconds to generate ]