 Wetlook World ForumCurrent time: Thu 18/04/24 14:13:14 GMT Translate page FROM Translate page TO | 
|
Wetlook World ForumCurrent time: Thu 18/04/24 14:13:14 GMT Translate page FROM Translate page TO |
|
|
Message # 62158.2.1.1 Subject: Date: Fri 29/08/14 13:45:18 GMT Name: WetSpandexLover |
Report Abuse or Problem to Nigel at Minxmovies
|
|
| Well said, George, this website has beautiful models, great outfits, and access to a pool and its all ruined with crappy workmanship. Even an entry level DSLR that can shoot RAW (to correct the white balance because its never good in most pools) and a couple of remote speedlight would do wonders to bring out the real vision of the photographer. As with most wetlook people, I have my preferences and it sad to see sites come up that cater to what I want to see but I end up never supporting them because their quality just isn't there. |
In reply to Message (62158.2.1)  You are right nat
By GeorgeSK -
I don't want to be too critical myself, because it is not popular on this forum, even if it is justified, but as a (former) paying customer, I have the right to say:
You are right nat. You are not the first one to point out the deficiencies of the photographer on this site. The owner doesn't see to listen.
And it is not just the skills of the photographer but the camera also. The exif data shows it is a Sony DSC-TX10, which is, albeit waterproof and shockproof, still only a compact camera, and not the best one at that, with limitations of the tiny lens. The white balance is way off too.
One more thing I noticed in the one and only update I bought - the video is so compressed that it is full of compression artifacts, many of my standard definition videos I bought look better that this kind of "HD", It is good as a hobby, but not as a professional output for resale. This was the only reason I never bought any updates from them ever since, otherwise I love the models.
I am not a professional photographer, more of a hobbyist, but my suggestion to the owner would be to invest some of the profit from the previous sets and:
1. Buy a new or even a good used DSLR, like an older Nikon D3100, or at least a high-end compact camera. The megapixel count doesn't matter. Wetlook-online, according to the exif data, uses a 10 year old 6 MP Nikon D70 DSLR and the results are brilliant. Pics are resampled for web use to about 2 MP anyway. 2. If waterproof is a must, buy a waterproof case for the DSLR, they are readily available for the best brands of DSLRs. 3. To show the wetness, which nat and me would like to see, use some lights or use a reflector. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Reflector_%28photography%29#mediaviewer/File:Photographing_a_model.jpg Natural light never seems to be enough to show the wetness in indoor and in some outdoor shootings.
|
In reply to Message (62158.2)  because of relatively poor photographic skills I can't seen much wetness [nt]
By nat -
(no text) |
In reply to Message (62158)  Jane Swims Bicycle Outfit
By Perfect Wetlook -
perfectwetlook1@gmail.com
Website: http://perfectwetlook.com/ New update on http://perfectwetlook.com/
|
Report Abuse or Problem to Nigel at Minxmovies
If you enjoy this forum, then please make a small donation to help with running costs:
(you can change amount)
|
|
Minx Movies - M12 - Dressed in Wet is now in the Download Store
Minx Movies - M15 - Wet Me Now is now in the Download Store
Minx Movies - M14 - Get Wet With Me is now in the Download Store
Minx Movies - M8 - Mask Of Wetness is now in the Download Store
[ This page took 0.053 seconds to generate ]
-> TO
Re:You are right nat
Fri 29/08/14 07:01:28 GMT
