Wetlook World Forum

Message # 62151.1.1.2

Subject: Which five bullet point facts appeared in that 9 minute video?

Date: Sat 30/08/14 09:09:25 GMT

Name: Rageaholic

Email:

Website:

By Rantaholic - Fri 29/08/14 23:55:15 GMT

Website:

The picture you are referring to has a wetlook model, two adults who are presumably parents/guardians of another person in the photo, a young girl also playing in the fountain.

- the child is not the focus of the photo

- the child is not naked, though she is wearing a swimming costume that would be considered OT in this forum

- the child is not provocatively or sexually suggestively posed or positioned in anyway

- nobody in the photo is performing a sexual act on the child

- if for whatever reason the child feels threatened or uncomfortable, one or both parents can take the child and remove her from the range of the camera and model, which they can clearly see standing before them.

I have no problem with that photo, because I see a wetlook model with just some random people in the background like many other public fountain sites show.  I am not the least bit concerned nor interested that a child is in frame.  And a paedo this is interested will have far worse pictures than this one to entertain himself with.

So, take your Sharia Law on what you think is paedophilia and get lost.  Or at least don't look at that photo again since it seems to offend you.  

By Anonymous - Thu 28/08/14 23:47:46 GMT

Website:

i absolutely love hummingbirds wetlook vids and sets, but set 11 as mentioned before breaks the moral if not legal rule regaurding children in wetlook vids,

i'm not sure if the admin at hummingbird understand this.

any argument that the children are not part of it has been obliterated as 1, the wetlook model is interacting with them in wetlook activities, 2, the children and or people underage are wearing clothes and shoes considered very highly on wetlookers 'to see' lists, 3 i doubt any of the children or adults know / knew that the video was made for sexual stimulation for an adult audiance, there are points in the video where the wetlook content of the underaged is of higher value than that of the intended adult model.

for these reasons i feel very strongly that the wetlook community and moderators make sure this is explained to hummingbird admin so they can delete this set from their sight

there are cases when children in the background of wetlook scene or pic are permitted, for instance when they are of no particular intreast to the wetlook fetish or outside of the wetlook activity, this can not be said for this set.

i would like to know peoples opinions regaurding set 11

By Hummingbird - admin@wethummingbird.com Thu 28/08/14 11:06:56 GMT

Website: wethummingbird.com