Wetlook World Forum

Current time: Fri 19/04/24 14:37:09 GMT

Translate page FROM -> TO

Translate page TO <- FROM

Message # 62143.3.2.1

Subject: This is insane.

Date: Thu 28/08/14 03:30:58 GMT

Name: Are you serious???

Email:

Website:

Report Abuse or Problem to Nigel at Minxmovies
If you enjoy this forum, then please make a small donation to help
with running costs: (you can change amount)

Choosing wetlook is in part a rebellion against mainstream society, which has 2 polar opposite views. 1) Puritanical view, which says you shouldn't even think about sex until you're 35 and married or 2) secular view, which is you are to be drained for every dollar you have constantly chasing sexual satisfaction that is never, ever provided. Wetlook is a nice escape from being either perpetually frustrated or outright victimized.

I don't mind spending money on wetlook if it is well produced. But often times wetlook production has the same sick attitude that turns people off about mainstream society's attitude toward sex - that your sex drive exists to make someone else rich.

My opinion is, it doesn't. It's just something fun about being alive.

If you want to make money from wetlook, make a good product and show some humility. Raging against a guy who made a video documenting a cherished family event is just odd. It also seems like a rather obvious attempt to sour people's attitudes toward candid, free wetlook. You know, so they spend more money on the "pro" stuff.

MK you have no reason to bitch. You constantly spam your videos from the 80s that are absolute crap quality. Your russian candid videos show a bunch of girls who don't get wet, and you call them "ultra HD", even though they are 720p which is already obsolete. If you want to make money on wetlook, quit bitching and make a better product. This video is better than anything you've come up with in your entire career.

In reply to Message (62143.3.2)

Re:Wet Wedding = Strap a GoPro camera to your dog ....

By MK - wamtec@comcast.net Wed 27/08/14 06:33:52 GMT

Website:

....You were lucky I have spared you all from my essay on the whole "ice bucket challenge" craze.....which I have been itching to write for the past week or so....cos I was originally going to title my essay "Does the Ice Bucket Challenge have a Chilling effect on Wetlook Producers",.... cos I originally thought these challenges would make every wetlook fans dreams come true....i.e. every possible celebrity has done this now....so thiis could mean an end to wetlook fans fantasies...cos they have all been fulfilled in the last 3 weeks......i.e. what else is there to look forward to any more.....

But I held off posting my essay, cos as all these challenges were being posted in the last 3 weeks...more than 10,000 of them with 900 celebs now participating....I started to notice a trend....ie.

...that the richest and most famous celebrities....apparently are not paid enough...cos they seem to have the crappiest cameras and cell phones, and I started to see a trend where 95% of these posings were either

- bad video quality

- bad lighting

- bad editing

- bad camerawork

- bad staging

- dumbed down (the candidate wears shots and a t shirt)

- copouts (wearing goggles or a wetsuit or running away, or the classic Sofia Vergara copout at the Emmys...using fake plastic ice and no water)

and the few that were staged well, shot well and in good quality....were no more than 5% of them.

So....the good news is, now I changed my mind....and this does not mean an end for the need for Wetlook Producers to exist in future, cos these ice bucket challenges are 95% "Yugos" (as you put it)....and it seems that the Ice Bucket Challenge

will be a passing fad like "The Macarena" and as hopefully as forgotten as the "Gangnam Style" craze 2 years ago.

I wonder what the next craze will be.......

I will leave you with a closing thought......I often wondered what it would bve like to live in an alternate universe where nobody ever used swimsuits and everyday activities like swimming and bathing were always done fully clothed. I have theorized for 25 years about this....and my theory was....if you lived in such a world where you saw your fantasies every day....you would soon be as bored with wetlook as a guy who works in a brewery gets bored with beer...and so you search for something new to interest your pecadillos. Certainly these Ice Bucket Challenges and the Black Tie Beach events have proven my theory (to me at least)....i.e. seeing too much of what you like and overdosing on it, soon gets to be old and boring....and so you start to look for something new to get interested in.

In reply to Message (62143.3)

Re:Wet Wedding = Strap a GoPro camera to your dog ....

By EdR - asplashofglamour@gmail.com Wed 27/08/14 02:43:24 GMT

Website: www.asplashofglamour.com

Yes, you'd be right. A dog with a go-pro would probably capture a much better scene. In this case, it would had been better not to waste your time viewing this crap. It fails on so many levels that I wouldn't bother considering it wetlook and therefore should be banished forever from this forum and others like it.

It's a lot like sharing a really bad photo of a Yugo to a car aficionado and then telling them how bad the photo really is, of this really bad car.

EdR

In reply to Message (62143)

Wet Wedding = Strap a GoPro camera to your dog ....

By MK - wamtec@comcast.net Tue 26/08/14 21:45:49 GMT

Website:

........and you will get better results than this.........

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5bsYsuFLPVg

What a waste of a great event.....i.e. put the camera in the hands of a drunken fool who points the camera in all the wrong places and misses all the money shots.

This reminds me of that old saying....even a broken clock is right once a day.....and this kind of camerawork style is called "wetlook captured by accident".....i.e. you feel the urge to tell

the camera guy......"what happened.....was this a mistajke...cos you actually pointed the camera in the right place for a few moments".

As I said....just strap a GoPro to your dog and you would get more chances of the camera pointing at something interesting than this camera guy was able to do.

ps....this remind me of the famous "Alien Autopsy video" tv show in the 1990's.....which was a hoax....and in order to perpetuate the hoax the camera guy and editors purposely avoided showing any of the money shots.

Mind you....Stephen Spielberg used this technique of "never show more 4 seconds of a money shot" to great effect in his landmark film "Jaws" in 1975....cos he instrructed his film editor never to show more than 4 seconds of the shark's head in one cut, cos he

said that if you showed more than 4 seconds then it would not be scary and people could then see it was a big rubber toy.

But I do not think the camera guy at this wedding is as smart as Stephen Spielberg....he was just drunk.

Report Abuse or Problem to Nigel at Minxmovies
If you enjoy this forum, then please make a small donation to help with running costs: (you can change amount)