Wetlook World Forum

I do not think it is appropriate for posh people to come into a biker bar and then try to get that bar to redecorate the bar according to their tastes.  There are 3 simple solutions to this..

a) Those who do not like the way this forum looks should just start their own forum and pay for the hostings costs themselves, or

b) The cheapest option would be to visit the place that is already decorated in a more subtle way, i.e. Graham';s forum....or

c) Make a proposal to Nigel who owns the forum, and ask him to consider installing an "ad free" option to his forum for "premum members"...and just like many premium media sites, you can pay $10 per month to Nigel for an ad free site where those

members who pay for a premium service will see all the ads disappear.

I am not a sports fan myself, but I see this like the subject of women being  let inside a male's locker room after a football game....and then complaining that the jocks are using bad language and acting in a crude manner....so now the women who visit the males locker room

want to clean things up and for the males to act more like gentlemen....just to make things a nicer experience for the ladies.....in their own locker room......because lets get real here....the wetlook domain is a 98% male domain, and there are no unattached non commercial single women who visit this forum anyways, because I have 20 years worth of demograpics data on the wetlook culture, and the very few women who are connected with the wetlook subject matter are either attached women who are accommdating their male partner's needs, or they are commercially driven women who work as models and merely seek to make money by catering to those male needs. In last 20 years I have never met a single unattached non commercial female in the wetlook culture. They are always catering to a partner, or catering to their business of selling wetlook media. The few exceptions to this you can count on one hand ..i.e. Wetmar, Jessica are exceptions....but both of those ladies are now gone from he scene....so I do not know of any unattached non commercial ladies who visit this forum.....so I feel that this place is the male's locker room and we should not have to redecorate our locker room to try and make things nicer for the ladies who may visit here....cos they are perfectly welcome to visit....but not to try and change things to suit their needs.

Hey...I have been married for 32 years....but I do not try to tell my wife how to organize her dressing room and closet....even though her closet is a mess and is not very neat ...and I am a neat person who likes to organize things....so I would love to organize my wlfe's closet and make things look neater to my eyes....but I stay out of there....cos that's her domain....ha ha.....just like this forum is our domain....and not something that should be changed to suit the less than 1% of vistors who may be females who may visit here.

> I hope Nigel considers JET's comments for the sake of welcoming more females.

I do not think that should be a goal for this forum....because this is a place visited by 98% males, and the only females who visit here are either attached or commercial.....and if they are attached then they know what the need to do in order to please their man, and if they are commercial, then they know what they need to do to sell their products, and that is...to cater to the 98% males on this forum. Before we change anything here.....do a study and research the following things....

- Graham has already done exactly what you want to be done...and created a very classy non crude site that tries to be as subtle as possible. His forum has been online for almost 10 years now....so ask Graham how successful has his forum been in the last 10 years at recruiting single unattached non commercial females to his forum. I doubt you can find any single unattached non commercial women on his forum either....so creating a nicer environment that welcomes women has done nothing to recruit female wetlookers at all.

- Consider the very few genune unattached non commercial women who were female wetlookers.....e.g. Wetmar, Jessica.......neither of them are active today....and did they leave the forums because they were offended by entering a male locker room and were offended by the graphic pictures on the wall in that locker room.....no.....their reasons for leaviing were personal and external reasons that had nothing to do with this forum and it's decorations.

So....the wetlook culture is like a town that his 2 main bars....one of them is a bikers bar...and the other is much more sophisticated and like a high class cocktail lounge. So now....you want to change the only bikers bar in town....to be more like the other high class bar....all to cater to less than 1% of females who may visit here....so personally I see this as being redundant.....i.e. why change this place to make it more like Graham's forum.

Also, it is a slippery slope whenever one single person starts to be a dictator and to define what he thinks wetlook "is" and what it "is not"..... i.e. where you say "My interest is in wet clothing, not wet crotches".....you are entitled to your opinion...but.just because you feel that way, does not give you the right to try and ban the wetlook crotcht subject from this forum, because I know MANY MANY people who would disagree with your view on that...especially the owner of this forum....who has always placed a heavy emphasis on wetlook crotch scenes in all of his video productions.

FYI, there are lots of people who have differing opinions on what they consider to be wetlook....and what they would like to ban from his forum as well....i.e.

- around 50% of the folks on this forum like the candid stuff.....but there are probably an equal number of people who feel that candid media should be banned

- there are a large number of people I know...who feel that wetlook should ONLY be about fully clothed people in non sexual situations....and they hate all forms of wetlook scenes that show nudity and are erotic....so they would like to see a NO NUDITY NO EROTICA wetlook forum.

Interestingly, that is originally how Graham's wetlook forum started out....catering to the folks who did not like wetlook erotica....so it was mostly more about the artistic nature of wetlook and not the erotica side....but over the years they have gradually eased up on that....so today their

forum has erotica too.

Anyway....all of this discussion is a moot point unless you contact Nigel by email...cos he is too busy with his day job to read all these forum threads....so he will only respond to requests for changes if you email him directly. I can tell you though....I have sent many emails to Nigel over

the last 15 years....suggesting changes to this forum...not about the content....but about the lack of features on this forum....so my suggestions have all been about making the forum better by having more features added....and I can tell you what Nigel's response has been to me whenever I suggested things to him....it is always the same answer.....i.e.Nope..... I like it the way it is....and if you do not like like it then I suggest you leave and start your own forum.....cos that is exactly what he said to me as recently as 3 months ago when I suggested things to him.....so...good luck on getting him to change this forum....

MK