Wetlook World ForumCurrent time: Thu 28/03/24 14:44:16 GMT |
Message # 59197.2.2 Subject: Re:New TV-show not to watch, but... Date: Sun 29/09/13 18:55:21 GMT Name: Steve |
Report Abuse or Problem to Nigel at Minxmovies
|
I agree with what you're saying... You want to see the girl enjoy themselves however I personally kind of like it when there's an accident yet then when the girl realizes what happened smiles and realizes she enjoys the situation. I dont like it when they become angry at what has just happened. Perhaps due to the accident they realize how much fun it is and may participate in wetlook voluntarily in the future |
In reply to Message (59197.2) Re:New TV-show not to watch, but...
By JT - jbt56@sonic.net Sat 28/09/13 15:22:43 GMT Unfortunately, for my tastes anyway, this will be another typical TV show where the wet women will only be the victims of accidents, etc. and therefore miserable or in some sort of agony. Major turn-off for me. Apparently, it's just not possible for TV writers to place women in wet situations for fun, or any sort of enjoyment. |
In reply to Message (59197) New TV-show not to watch, but...
By Frank (the noname) - Sat 28/09/13 12:32:21 GMT ... at least one of us should do the dirty job. Just came across a new show called "SAF3" (no, I did not mistype - pronounce it like "safe"). It's from Gregory J. Bonann, who already plagued the world with "Baywatch". The first ep "SAF3" at least contains 2 good wetlook scenes, jeans in the very beginning. Nevertheless - I wasn't able to go through the entire first episode. The show is a real stinker. Like most flicks containing great wetlook on big or little screen. Why do we wetlook-fans always have to suffer this much... |
Report Abuse or Problem to Nigel at Minxmovies
If you enjoy this forum, then please make a small donation to help with running costs:
(you can change amount)
|
[ This page took 0.227 seconds to generate ]