minx

Wetlook World Forum

Current time: Thu 28/03/24 11:39:30 GMT

Translate page FROM gb -> TO de fr it nl es pt jp

Translate page TO gb <- FROM de fr it nl es pt jp

MyWetloook

Message # 53839.3.1.1.1.1.1.2.1

Subject: Hello Re:G4 mockery--MST3K

Date: Sat 31/03/12 09:03:28 GMT

Name: Jessica ca

Email: friends@fantasystockings.com

Website:

Report Abuse or Problem to Nigel at Minxmovies
If you enjoy this forum, then please make a small donation to help
with running costs: Make Donation (you can change amount)

Previous Reply
Next New Message
Active List Archive

Wetlook-Online
I think that it's not the same to compare to TV shows with celebrities.  Public person is not the same as individual posing for a private website.  

 

When I modeled before, I made sure in my release form there was a clause against defamatory use.  

 

There was a case when a model did a photoshoot and somebody took that photo from the web and used it as illustration for an article about youth and prostitution.  Such unlawful use ended up in a serious lawsuit, not only for copyright breach but also to compensate the model for such bad exposure.  

 

However, some people are a little stupid and they put their signature on whatever without looking.  This way they can't complain if a photographer puts their work on a stock site, someone downloads it from a stock site (considering that there is no limitations on usage there) and use those pictures for venerical disease article and so on.  

In reply to Message (53839.3.1.1.1.1.1.2) None Re:G4 mockery--MST3K

By BootFancy - uu Sat 31/03/12 00:36:38 GMT

Website:


I think you're right, Anthony. And if I may add, in the case of Mystery Science Theater 3000, they paid for the rights to use those movies, and doubtless told the owners of the films exactly how they would be used.

BTW, to keep this on a wetlook theme, at least one movie MST3K used had a wetlook scene--Swamp Diamonds. Beverly Garland and another woman have a catfight in the water wearing blouses and cutoff jeans shorts (or maybe full length jeans; I forget exactly).

In reply to Message (53839.3.1.1.1.1.1) Talking Re:G4 mockery

By AnthonyX - anthonyx@jowc.net ca Fri 30/03/12 15:37:37 GMT

Website:


I doubt anyone could successfully sue for something like that. As litigious as the US is, there is a doctrine of "fair use" in copyright legislation, and free speech is very well protected. If you watch American late night TV, especially shows which engage in political satire, you'll see exaclty the same sort of treatment applied to sound bites. And, if you've ever seen "Mystery Science Theater" or Canada's "Ed the Sock", you'd see the virtually the same treatment done to bad movies.

In reply to Message (53839.3.1.1.1.1) Oooh Re:G4 mockery?

By Jessica - friends@fantasystockings.com ca Fri 30/03/12 07:21:08 GMT

Website: http://fantasywetlook.com// www.fantasywetlook.com


About G4 mockery:

To me this is theft of copyrighted material and also defamatory use.  I think I'd sue for such thing.  

In reply to Message (53839.3.1.1.1) None Re:G4 mockery?

By MK - wamtec@comcast.net gb Thu 29/03/12 23:01:59 GMT

Website:


The G4 channel tv show was called "The International Sexy Ladies Show" and they kept stealing clips from Flaviu's Eurowam sites and then re-editing them and adding their own mocking commentary to the clips, saying how dumb and stupid this was. The show aired Flaviu's clips on 4-5 of their shows in 2010, and I posted them to the Wambank (you must have seen them)....but Flaviu was not amused with how his girls were being demeaned and mocked by the commentator so he removed those clips from the Wambank site....cos they were not playing fair.....i.e. they would re-edit clips taken off Flaviu's site and not even contact him to ask for permission to use those clips on their tv show.

 

What I find hypocritical about the way mainstream tv shows treat us....is that G4 channel is owned by Viacom...who own all the MTV and VH1 channels....and they are as far left liberal and supposedly socially conscious as you can get.....yet those same liberals would never pick on the gay or black community and make fun of them.....but if you are a toothless redneck ....or a wetlook fan....or a christian.....you are fair game to be mocked....so where is all this "tolerance" that the far left MTV crowd preaches to the world....cos it is not given to us.

 

MK

In reply to Message (53839.3.1.1) Question G4 mockery?

By AnthonyX - anthonyx@jowc.net ca Thu 29/03/12 21:43:37 GMT

Website:


I'd be curious to see an example or two of the mockery by G4 tv you talk about.

 

Always helps to know a little more about what "the other guy" is thinking

In reply to Message (53839.3.1) None Re:Unexpected benefit of wetlook

By MK - wamtec@comcast.net gb Thu 29/03/12 19:19:50 GMT

Website:


I think the immortal words of Forrest Gump and Monty Python sum up what being a wetlook has been like for me......i.e. "Life is like a box of chocolates, you never know what you will get".......and I got the "Crunchy Frog"....and so you try to make the best of what life deals to you.

 

All those things you say about not wanting to belong to mainstream groups or sororities or teams or "gangs" is certainly true......wetlook fans tend to be loners......and so do Goth fans too...

 

Bear in mind....this entire thread also used to be true about gay people too....cos until the 1970 it was socially unacceptable to be outwardly gay (cos it used to be illegal in the UK until the 1950's)....and the only difference between being gay and being a wetlook fan is that being gay used to be socially unacceptable but now today it is highly acceptable and lauded, whereas wetlook fans are still pretty much mocked in society......i.e. we do not have "pride" and mainsteam acceptance and millions marching in parades the way that gay people have today. We do not have famous celebrities supporting us the way that most hollywood celebs support the gay community......cos there is really no difference between a gay person and a wetlook fan when it boils down to the major key point........i.e. they can't achieve orgasm using "traditional" sexual means, and they can only achieve sexual satisfaction via "an aternative lifestyle".

 

The only real difference between the gay community and the wetlook community....is NUMBERS.....i.e. they have hundreds of millions of people in their communities around the world.....and we only have less than 30,000 wetlook fans around the world.......so because of their huge numbers, they have managed to convince the world today that their alternative lifestyle is now deemed to be a traditional lifestyle.....and so it is a powerful political force that gets major respect these days.....whereas our little community of a few thousand folks remains as something that is still mostly mocked and riduculed by mainstream people and especially by mainstream tv shows who always portray the wam culture in a mocking way...... so we are like Rodney Dangerfield said....we get no respect.

 

If we had a famous celebrity who would champion our lifestyle......like Lady Gaga does for the gay community.......that would help us a lot. Famous celebs have done a lot to make being gay "fashionable" and trendy........now if only we could get some celebrities to do that for us as well.

 

If you look at the portrayal of gay people in movies and tv shows over the last 70 years.....they basically went thru 3 phases.....i.e.

 

- covert ......i.e. Hollywood went to great lengths to hide the sexual orientation of many movie stars....i.e. they even created a rule that male hollywood stars were not allowed to be seen in public in pairs....and they were only allowed to go out to clubs as threesomes or foursomes....cos 3 guys drinkng in a club looked ok...but 2 guys together looks suspicious....Cary Grant and Randolph Scott lived together for many years...but only went out to clubs in threesomes with their other buddies. Hollywood Studio Heads were so powerful, they would even force many stars into "lavender marriages"....where a gay male star married a lesbian actress...purely to hide their real lives.....so this was common until the 1950's......then gay people entered a new phase....

 

- stereotyping.....and being the butt of jokes and ridicule or playing flamboyant over the top characters like Liberace or John Inman in order to gain a following......and finally in the last 20 years....

 

- respect and acceptance.....which is where the gay community is today...and it has now become politically incorrect to play gay stereotypes any more (unless you are genius writers/performers like David Walliams and Matt Lucas)

 

Anyway....back to the wetlook community.....it basically took the gay community about 70 years to go from being covert to being open but ridiculed....to now being accepted and respected. The wetlook community is still in the phase of being mocked and ridiculed (especially by media tv shows in recent years) and so it will probably be at least another 20-30 years before we get any respect or acceptance....cos we do not have our "Lady Gaga" to champion our cause yet.

 

FYI, I have seen MANY MANY tv documentaries about wetlook fans in the last 15 years......and nearly all the tv documentary portrayals of us on UK and U,.S. tv shows are always portraying us in a mocking way....we are just a joke for most mainstream tv shows...something that they belittle. The one country that DOES do a very fair and respectful portrayal of wetlook fans are the GERMAN tv shows.....cos they always portray us in a serious and respectful way....and not in a mocking way. So....the German TV media does a good job, so I give them high marks for the way they portray us......but the UK and U.S. shows who do segments on us.....they treat us like we are a bunch of weirdos.....e.g. the G4 tv channel in the USA often crops bits from Flaviu's videos...and then overlays their own inane commentary on how they think this is pathetic and that we are a bunch of losers.

 

The irony for me is.....these same tv shows and commentators that often mock us.....show great respect for gay oriented tv shows...and they would never dare to call what gay people do as weird behaviour and mock them....but they will quickly mock us and what we do.

 

Now....if only we could get Lady Gaga to make a "fashion statement" and to start a trend of wearing shiny or clinging wet clothing in public......that would really be helpful....cos nobody would dare to mock her.....they would all follow what she does and treat this as a new fashion trend.

 

MK

In reply to Message (53839.3) Talking Re:Unexpected benefit of wetlook

By AnthonyX - anthonyx@jowc.net ca Thu 29/03/12 15:36:03 GMT

Website:


This is an interesting thread for me because I think I have always been a little out of the mainstream too, kinda followed the beat of a different drummer. I've never followed professional team sports, much of my life I've never had an interest in what was then current music (now considered classic rock), never really accomplished much of the "male bonding" thing either.

 

Of course I like the thought Jessica left us with... things we could look forward to.

In reply to Message (53839) Read This Unexpected benefit of wetlook

By Silas - uu Thu 29/03/12 03:09:55 GMT

Website:


An unexpected benefit of wetlook.

As I was watching a "Drunk Sex Orgy" update, I was frustrated by all the porn, and hoping that they would get to the "good stuff", the girls fully clothed in the shower.

I couldn't help thinking how completely opposite that is from most other guys, if they were watching the same video, they would be completely frustrated by all these silly girls in the shower in all their clothes, and why don't they get naked and start having sex?

And that led to this thought - my wetlook fetish serves an additional purpose. I have never really "bonded" with a group of other guys. Never been part of any fraternity, any club, any like-minded group of guys. Never been fully immersed into any team mentality, any group philosophy, any herd thinking. And part of that is because my sex drive (which is a huge component of our consciousness, our intentions, our direction) has a polar opposite dimension to most other guys.

This keeps me going in a completely different direction than most other guys would.

This month, I have been working on a recovery program (for alcoholics, not wetlookaholics) where it teaches you to embrace yourself and accept yourself AS YOU ARE. Not so you'd change. I am 36 years old, and I still have EXACTLY the same sexual desires as when I was 12. I don't see this changing, and I am slowly working my way around to just embracing it as a part of who I am.

But the dominating nature of sex drive, because it drives me in such an unusual direction, in such an all-consuming fashion, serves to point my thinking in an unusual direction, and in so doing, creates a unique purpose for my point of view. New conclusions, new ideas, new combinations of old concepts. Cool stuff.

Which is an unexpected benefit of wetlook.

Report Abuse or Problem to Nigel at Minxmovies
If you enjoy this forum, then please make a small donation to help with running costs: Make Donation (you can change amount)

All WAM Drunk Sex Orgy Wetlook-Online
Clips4Sale

Minx Movies - M12 - Dressed in Wet is now in the Download Store
Download Store

Minx Movies - M15 - Wet Me Now is now in the Download Store
Download Store

Minx Movies - M14 - Get Wet With Me is now in the Download Store
2ipmd65.jpg2ipmdg2.jpgckfbj77.jpgjapgs25.jpgzgjbt99.jpg Download Store 2fpbs94.jpgkijws74.jpgrlsps97.jpglasbjg7.jpg2fptg96.jpg2gpdde7.jpg


Minx Movies - M8 - Mask Of Wetness is now in the Download Store
Download Store



[ This page took 0.030 seconds to generate ]