Wetlook World Forum

Current time: Tue 16/04/24 14:05:18 GMT

Translate page FROM -> TO

Translate page TO <- FROM

Message # 52665.1.1

Subject: Let's not go there! Don't open it if it's not your thing! [nt]

Date: Mon 12/12/11 20:50:48 GMT

Name: wetwhiteandblue

Email:

Website:

Report Abuse or Problem to Nigel at Minxmovies
If you enjoy this forum, then please make a small donation to help
with running costs: (you can change amount)

(no text)

In reply to Message (52665.1)

Am I the only one who finds both of them uninteresting ? [nt]

By plonss - Mon 12/12/11 20:46:36 GMT

Website:

(no text)

In reply to Message (52665)

Baptisms vs flight attendants

By A lurker with a question - Mon 12/12/11 20:30:36 GMT

Website:

Am I the only one who finds videos of wet flight attendants more offensive than baptism videos? Seriously, when I think of a wet flight attendant, I immediately think of a plane crash. Not sexy. I fly quite a bit, and if I never see a wet flight attendant in person, that's fine with me.

I appreciate the concerns about baptism videos, but as long as the church lets the candidates know that video will be online and publicly accessible, and that they should give some thought to what they will wear at that time, I don't know that it should be a problem. I mean, on any given Sunday, you may find an attractive, well-dressed woman sitting near you in church. Is it wrong to look at her because it's in church? Would it be different if it was the library? I don't think we need to repress our sexuality within the walls of the church.

Report Abuse or Problem to Nigel at Minxmovies
If you enjoy this forum, then please make a small donation to help with running costs: (you can change amount)