Wetlook World ForumCurrent time: Thu 25/04/24 10:40:41 GMT |
Message # 51178.2 Subject: Re:[discussion] Our own classification system for pics and clips Date: Sat 30/07/11 22:06:05 GMT Name: BlueShinobi |
Report Abuse or Problem to Nigel at Minxmovies
|
We need a tagging system, not a rating system. The most important tags would be the girl's weight and the quality of video. %95 of what's posted here is beached whales and the videos look like they were shot on a cell phone in 2005. |
In reply to Message (51178) [discussion] Our own classification system for pics and clips
By wetmusic - Sat 30/07/11 13:22:24 GMT Let this topic be a discussion on what constitutes offensive exhibition of minors and of religiously-engaged people.
Maybe we should come up with our own classification system; just like motion picture rating system (wikipedia: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Motion_picture_rating_system). This forum's moderators could then post the classes on the board.Posters of pictorial or multimedia wetlook content would then be expected to rate each entry with a set of abbreviations, after the URL pointing to that content.
An entry would just be something like this: http://www.youtube.com.wer987wg987 M U R. Jeans and white T, rope swing fail. Good quality
I feel that the little more effort from the posters would alleviate a lot of collective aggravation.
I am sure that the most committed posters among us – God bless you all! – would adopt the system and the rest of us would follow the new tradition
Ideas?.
|
Report Abuse or Problem to Nigel at Minxmovies
If you enjoy this forum, then please make a small donation to help with running costs:
(you can change amount)
|
[ This page took 0.002 seconds to generate ]