minx

Wetlook World Forum

Current time: Thu 28/03/24 20:45:01 GMT

Translate page FROM gb -> TO de fr it nl es pt jp

Translate page TO gb <- FROM de fr it nl es pt jp

Wetlook.Biz
Wetlook-Online

Message # 51046.4.1.1.1.1

Subject: None True, but you CAN sort Youtubes, but not such candids...

Date: Wed 20/07/11 16:41:53 GMT

Name: Mahoney eu

Email:

Website:

Report Abuse or Problem to Nigel at Minxmovies
If you enjoy this forum, then please make a small donation to help
with running costs: Make Donation (you can change amount)

Previous Reply
Next New Message
Active List Archive

Wetlook-Online
and that's the difference. Period. That's what makes this everything but double standards. Pepe deliberately posted photos of underage girls after being asked by the admin not to. Rumpel posted links to galleries with thousands of pics, where some girls are of different ages, which you can't really check. If you don't see the difference then we should eliminate all candids. Cause girls that play in fountains are generally in their teens and early 20s and in every batch there is probably one or two that might be underage (but who can really tell). And if we eliminate all candids, most people will go elsewhere - like to the Russian forum listed above. People like this forum exactly for the candids. So the rules are IMHO quite good. When you can check the age or the girl (if linking to an individual girls photos/videos) is evidently underage - don't post. While posting to groups? Well how can you tell.

 

BTW: hope I didn't piss Nigel off with these comments. A lawyer is always a lawyer it may seem and what Pepe and you did with the double standards fuss just makes no sense, so I wanted to clarify the difference, as it is glaring in the face of everyone here I think...

In reply to Message (51046.4.1.1.1) None Re:Unsortable galleries with many pics vs tubes of girls with age in profie!

By Hans - ch Wed 20/07/11 16:24:22 GMT

Website:


Here (lurking mostly) since 2003, so I'm well aware and a big fan of Rumpel's contribs as well.  

 

And let's not suggest age in a profile is the all-determining factor, as there are plenty of 14 yo with profiles listing them as 19 or 21.

 

In reply to Message (51046.4.1.1) Note Unsortable galleries with many pics vs tubes of girls with age in profie!

By Mahoney - eu Wed 20/07/11 16:05:46 GMT

Website:


When you link to gigantic galleries of hundreds of photos you can't sort them by hand. When you post individual Youtubes with age information in profiles you can...

 

BTW: Hans, you haven't been here long I can see. Pepe has posted some good links - true. But Rumpel is the real king of Candid Wetlook. He posted more links then anyone and to sites that are very hard to find (you have to search in strange languages etc.). If anyone should be cut some slack as far as rules are concerned it should be Rumpel. He is the only poster here that can be called the king of candid wetlook. Pepe posted a lot, sure, but he'd have to post about a thousand more tubes to give the community the same amount of material.

In reply to Message (51046.4.1) Confused Double standards...

By Hans - ch Wed 20/07/11 15:54:42 GMT

Website:


Confused I'm with Pepe on this one....here's a guy that's posted hundreds of quality links for months and gets slapped because a few times he's missed the mark (or didn't read the profile).  On the other hand, a good trove of hundreds of pictures of mostly teenagers is posted and there's applause and back-slapping from the group and little mention of the young ones.  Little wonder Pepe's confused and feeling unmotivated.

 

I for one prefer to use my own sense of judgement.  I know what appeals to me and what doesn't.  If I download or see a pic that doesn't appeal to me because the subject is too young, I simply delete it and move on with life without screaming "pedo!" at the original poster.  This isn't a hard-core site with nudity, and if those images ever appeared I would expect Nigel to act swiftly to correct the problem.

In reply to Message (51046.4) Angry Here are many pictures of girls under 16 years. And nobody says anything

By pepevilluela - es Wed 20/07/11 14:44:25 GMT

Website:


I'm the one who is criticized. How much hypocrisy
In reply to Message (51046) Links Russian Flashmob-Partys Over 1000 Pictures and more

By Rumpel - de Wed 20/07/11 08:53:34 GMT

Website:


http://vkontakte.ru/albums-26460183

http://vkontakte.ru/albums-11674467

http://vkontakte.ru/albums-13181050

http://vkontakte.ru/albums-11926262

http://vkontakte.ru/albums-17394708

http://vkontakte.ru/albums-9469395

http://vkontakte.ru/albums-18940472

http://vkontakte.ru/albums-28088035

http://vkontakte.ru/albums-19300652

http://vkontakte.ru/albums-18922108

http://vk.com/albums-26711038

http://vk.com/albums-27948887

http://vk.com/albums-19135897

Scroll down and change the language

 

 

Forum

http://wamclub.f.qip.ru/?1-1-0-00000001-000-10001-0

 

http://best-3-0.livejournal.com/748704.html

 


Report Abuse or Problem to Nigel at Minxmovies
If you enjoy this forum, then please make a small donation to help with running costs: Make Donation (you can change amount)

All WAM Drunk Sex Orgy Wetlook-Online
WetLooker.com

Minx Movies - M12 - Dressed in Wet is now in the Download Store
Download Store

Minx Movies - M15 - Wet Me Now is now in the Download Store
Download Store

Minx Movies - M14 - Get Wet With Me is now in the Download Store
2ipmd65.jpg2ipmdg2.jpgckfbj77.jpgjapgs25.jpgzgjbt99.jpg Download Store 2fpbs94.jpgkijws74.jpgrlsps97.jpglasbjg7.jpg2fptg96.jpg2gpdde7.jpg


Minx Movies - M8 - Mask Of Wetness is now in the Download Store
Download Store



[ This page took 0.002 seconds to generate ]