Wetlook World ForumCurrent time: Sat 20/04/24 09:57:16 GMT |
Message # 49114.2.1.1 Subject: Re:The 'problem posts' Date: Mon 14/02/11 16:37:49 GMT Name: Tim |
Report Abuse or Problem to Nigel at Minxmovies
|
I agree with Nigel.... the clue is in the hyper link address most of the time there are plenty of warnings of about the content..... so its down to you weather to risk opening the link...... or not......
continue to post is my vote.... Tim uk |
In reply to Message (49114.2.1) The 'problem posts'
By Nigel Forum Admin - nigel@wetlook.com Mon 14/02/11 15:44:56 GMT Website: www.wetlook.com I don't normally publish private email, but as WK started this thread, I think people should know what he was complaining about:
WK: This one...scroll down and you see a blow job given to a man after the blue dress....Does not belong here (49111) http://forum.minxmovies.com/showc.cgi?49111 Adeline's New WetlookSex Update [XXX Rated] By WetlookSex Mon 14/02/11 13:01:21 A second one Nigel.... (49091) http://forum.minxmovies.com/showc.cgi?49091 shower in nightdress (Warning: NUDITY) By X_Wet_X Sun 13/02/11 12:13:58 GMT I wish for th old days when these people did not infiltrate our space and we do not bother them.
My reply: sorry, but I have no problem with either of these posts. They contain good wetlook, and they are clearly marked as to their explicit content. WetlookSex is run by Flaviu's team in Romania, who also bring you many great 'normal' wetlook sites.
There is no problem posting a link to a page with wetlook content, even if there is 'porn' elsewhere on the page, SO LONG AS THIS IS MARKED CLEARLY, which both of these are. If this thread goes on, then it will be deleted, as this is no different from the trouble caused by trolls !
If anyone sees anything inappropriate, then please email me.
Nigel Forum Admin |
In reply to Message (49114.2) ???
By Nigel Forum Admin - nigel@wetlook.com Mon 14/02/11 10:59:54 GMT Website: www.wetlook.com Can you give me some examples ?
We have had a couple of spammers posting pron crap recently, is this what you are complaining about ?
Looking down the list of messages, I can't see the problem, or am I missing something ???
Okay, "significant wetlook content" is 38% ... what does that mean... exactly, that's why I left it vague. If you see a porn post with no real wetlook, then let me know, and I'll remove it.
Nigel Forum Admin
|
In reply to Message (49114) WHY ? Why Nigel have you let this forum...
By WK - waterloggedproductions@yahoo.com Mon 14/02/11 07:54:00 GMT Website: http://www.waterloggedproductions.com/ / waterloggedproductions.com I would have addressed this specifically, but thought perhaps many other peoples views might be stated......
I have been with this community for 10 years now and many nice friends have been made who share the same interest as I do in fully clothed wetlook, no matter what the attire is..
However I have come to notice that in the past several years MORE and More XXX and Nudity has come into this forum with people who really don NOT give a damn about wet clothing...and this is what this forum is all about...WET CLOTHES ...Not wet skin.... Do you all agree?
My Gosh...there are a bizzillion PORN and XXX sites out there over the internet....WHY do these people want to invade our space with there type of turn on and better yet...WHY is it allow by the moderators.
CAN we please go back to just wet clothing forums and fully clothed pictures as before Nigel ...PLEASE
The triple X porns do not allow fully clothed wet jeans and dresses on their sites, then why let them invade ours.
This is just something I had to mention and hope that the majority of the community that supports wetlook and the old heads that are still around will please speak up and return us to what we really like...WETLOOK in clothes.
Thank you all... (WK)
|
Report Abuse or Problem to Nigel at Minxmovies
If you enjoy this forum, then please make a small donation to help with running costs:
(you can change amount)
|
[ This page took 0.015 seconds to generate ]