Wetlook World ForumCurrent time: Sat 20/04/24 08:35:18 GMT |
Message # 44917.5 Subject: Re:PPV vs Membership Date: Mon 28/06/10 13:38:11 GMT Name: Anonymous |
Report Abuse or Problem to Nigel at Minxmovies
|
My personal preference is membership sites, although I have purchased both. Sites like WetlookUniversity and WetlookOnline have content of a similar nature and I appreciate having multiple new updates available during the membership period that I know are going to follow the theme of the site. It's also a lot more affordable to spend $25.00 for a monthly membership rather than $8 - $10 for a single photo set. PPV for large, HD videos makes sense but not photo sets from a consumer's point of view! |
In reply to Message (44917) PPV vs Membership
By Dr Nick - Sat 26/06/10 02:08:27 GMT Just wondering what everyone’s view is on the 2 types of pay for sites. It seem more sites are moving over to the Pay Per View type sites and away from a fixed term membership. I can see where this is a big advantage to the site owner as it stops people from joining for a month and grabbing all the content and then leaving the site (I hold my hand up to this). But what does everyone else think? I for one preferred the old system as you get a lot more material, granted you might not like it all but you sometimes get sets that you wouldn't have bought from the preview pictures that turn out to be very good. And what the view of the site owners? Obviously you bandwidth usage will be a lot lower but does it make you more money? (Which is why you run a site I guess). But is increasing the cost to the customers only going to encourage file sharing and piracy? Discuss
Dr Nick
|
Report Abuse or Problem to Nigel at Minxmovies
If you enjoy this forum, then please make a small donation to help with running costs:
(you can change amount)
|
[ This page took 0.030 seconds to generate ]