Wetlook World Forum

Current time: Thu 18/04/24 17:47:30 GMT

Translate page FROM -> TO

Translate page TO <- FROM

Message # 40461.5.1

Subject: Re: intentional Wetlook prefered

Date: Sun 14/06/09 10:37:29 GMT

Name: Sopping

Email: katakai1@verizon.net

Website:

Report Abuse or Problem to Nigel at Minxmovies
If you enjoy this forum, then please make a small donation to help
with running costs: (you can change amount)

And one of the reasons I prefer a casual dress. On one memorable occasion, some years ago, with a g/f I was instrumental in what would be called here, unintentional wetlook. We were walking by a stream and I encouraged her to "come wading" with me. She had no intention of getting wet. But I did, by example. In short order. my rolled-up pants were at the endge of getting wet (this was intentional). She held her skirt up, which was delightful, and approached "pantie-high" depth. As is so often the case, her hem was getting thoroughly wet in the rear as she held the front high. When I called this to her attention, she managed to get more of her skirt wet in a delightful process, and then gave up and ended up, waist deep, skirt drenched. This was "unintentional wetlook" but her eventual soaking made it "intentional." This would not have been the scenario with pants or jeans, as she would have had to make the committment as soon as her rolled-up pants were in danger.......much earlier on. Do you follow?

In reply to Message (40461.5)

Re: intentional Wetlook prefered

By the Hopeless case - Sat 13/06/09 00:54:46 GMT

Website:

Hey Mr. E

I completely agree. There are all kinds of permutations of wetlook, all according to personal preference. But I would always prefer any situation that the lady has the "wammer gene", and has a personal craving to soak her clothes. (and or shoes/ socks/ stockings) There are relatively few produced scenes of quiet wetlook, where slashing, and fun is not invloved. Most wetlook scenes are more often about frolicking and splashing around.. that's more in fun. But I believe in real life, in private, their enjoyment is more often a more serene, sensitive experience. We do not see this produced very often.

In reply to Message (40461)

intentional Wetlook prefered

By Mr. E. - Fri 12/06/09 13:47:14 GMT

Website:

Refering to an article a while back...

I absolutely prefer intentional wetlook. I like the idea that a girls gets wet because she WANTS to get wet and she does it BECAUSE SHE ENJOYS IT.

A girl falling in or getting pushed gives me absolutely nothing. I bought a couple of videos and saw the girls falling in or getting thrown in and I was so disappointed. I would never again buy a video in which the girls just get pushed in or fall, as they neither seem to want it nor seem to like it.

I like the moment when a girl gets in slowly, deeper and deeper enjoying what she does.

If wetlook is just an accident... well... it's just an accident... nothing more.

Are there any more feeling like me?

Report Abuse or Problem to Nigel at Minxmovies
If you enjoy this forum, then please make a small donation to help with running costs: (you can change amount)