Wetlook World Forum

Current time: Tue 23/04/24 21:53:38 GMT

Translate page FROM -> TO

Translate page TO <- FROM

Message # 40461.3.2.1

Subject: Re: intentional Wetlook prefered

Date: Sat 13/06/09 10:08:47 GMT

Name: MK

Email: wamtec@comcast.net

Website:

Report Abuse or Problem to Nigel at Minxmovies
If you enjoy this forum, then please make a small donation to help
with running costs: (you can change amount)

>The other way would be to advertise

Well....there 2 ways to do that....within the wam community, and outside of the wam community. Within the wam community all you have to do is organize a pool party for self-wetlook fans only....no voyeurs or couples allowed ...... and to promote your pool party on either this forum or the Wacky Wet forum. They do this all the time on the Wacky Wet forum, cos this is especially popular in Germany....but the attendees are always 95% males, and the few females that attend are there to please their partners, not themselves. If you try to advertise a wetlook pool party for unattached single self-wetlook females only....i.e. no voyeurs or couples allowed.....I can guarantee you that nobody will show up.

The best way to advertise things in the mainstream world....is to use Craigh's List....e.g. the Spanish tv network Univision are currently filming a new wet and messy gameshow called "Juego de Oro" that will debut later this summer. I have seen some trailers and there are lots of wet and messy games....and see how the tv production company get the contestants for their show.....they just advertise for people on Craigs List in the Miami area where I live...

http://miami.craigslist.org/mdc/tfr/1173150672.html

Note how they only pay $70 per day for people to play their wet and messy games ...which is basically only covering your gasoline costs and lunch money ...so the contestants basically do these games for nothing (gee...I wish I could get talent to work for $70 per day....cos none of the models we know will even get out of bed for less than $400 per day...ha ha).

The reality is.....such events like this and Leon's MostWet events are a success because they do NOT advertise wetlook or wet clothes as being the primary reason for the event, those events are a success because they have "incidental wetlook"....they do not promote "purposeful wetlook".

In reply to Message (40461.3.2)

Re: intentional Wetlook prefered

By the Hopeless case - Sat 13/06/09 00:42:54 GMT

Website:

How's it going MK,

I would also suppose a commercial production of candid wetlook would be difficult if not impossible. The only way to do that would be in the right places at the right time to film candid, voluntary acts of getting wet, unreliable at best. The other way would be to advertise, and recruit volunteers, also unreliable due to the lack of real life practitioners, and who would probably NOT openly advertise their "secret" fetish. So you would be back to square 1.. the incentive would be the money.. or just the volunteer who makes a false admission of secretly getting wet just for the money. EuroWAM TEAM has an outstanding site which "on the spot recruits" are persuaded to agree to soak the outfits they're wearing... however there is no guarantee any of these ladies actually have done this before.

In real life, I have known many women who enjoyed getting wet, many!! Although not an active participant myself, have observed, and heard accounts told (ladies chatting with other ladies) just a few examples: at a southern college. lots of rainfall, and increased incidence of ladies wading through flooded parking lots, some of which slowed their walk or stood in deeper areas prolonging the duration they were in the water (instead of high stepping out as quickly as possible to minimize the assault) There are a few sandy beaches along the Hudson River where hikers, and just people walking their dogs voluntarily enter the river clothed.. either wade, or swim, and occasionally with shoes on who seem to enjoy the experience. While in college, I was on the phone with a lovely girl who lived in a house with a stream along the side of the property. I had cleverly accused her of being in the stream straight (testing the waters) "I'll bet you've ended up in that stream with your clothes on and all..." She gasped, moritfied that I would even suggest such a thing (a good Catholic, and refused to comment on it) A few days later she reminded me that I had made a reference to her stream, and that it just happened that she had done so (as if it were a confession and it was) which I was greatly surprised since I had apologized for mentioning it in the first place. I wish I had more to tell, she happened to be stuck on this other guy, got married and moved to Boston, so we never had any more than a good friendship. I had a wonderful girlfriend who had the most gorgeous legs. I always seem to fall for the snobs who wear heels and nylons, 'cause I'm an idiot ... haha anyway.. this one day it had been pouring and the streets were swelled with deep water at the curbs in places. I actually asker her if we could walk through it, just for the He!! of it.. Her answer was no.. because people spit on the sidewalks, and it's all there in the runoff.. that she would be willing to do that if the water was clean. I was impressed that certain conditions were attached, and we would be good to go. I never forgot that!

In reply to Message (40461.3)

Re: intentional Wetlook prefered

By MK - wamtec@comcast.net Fri 12/06/09 17:33:10 GMT

Website:

Interesting discussion topic.....I can dig that too...if I could find it....but it is very rare to find this. What kind of sites or media outlets meet that criteria that you describe...where the girl gets wet cos "she" enjoys it and wants to do it for herself....

- you can't count any site that has a commercial aspect to it, cos those models are merely getting wet cos it is a business for them and they are paid models.

- you can't count any "couples sites" either, cos those ladies are getting wet in order to please their husbands or boyfriends....not to pleasure themselves.

- you can't count scenes you see on Youtube, cos those girls are totally "oblivious" to wetlook...and they are just wild and crazy girls having fun in the water and they are not cognisant of being clothed at all

- you can't count movie or tv scenes, cos again, these are paid actresses who are just being paid to do a job...not because they love wetlook.

So....what is left. The only qualifying factor would be any wetlook female who is not connected with a commercial site and getting paid for their performance, and any wetlook female who is unattached and single and is not doing things to please her hubby or boyfriend....and are getting wet purely to please themselves and for non-commercial reasons. ......and I do not see very many examples of single/unattached/non commercial wetlook ladies who meet that criteria. But there are some....e.g. Wetmar on Graham's forum would be a very good example....but I do not see any non-commercial un-attached females on this forum....I wish there were more women who were getting wet purely to satisfy themselves and not for commercial reasons or to keep their partners happy....but I don't see it !!!

In reply to Message (40461)

intentional Wetlook prefered

By Mr. E. - Fri 12/06/09 13:47:14 GMT

Website:

Refering to an article a while back...

I absolutely prefer intentional wetlook. I like the idea that a girls gets wet because she WANTS to get wet and she does it BECAUSE SHE ENJOYS IT.

A girl falling in or getting pushed gives me absolutely nothing. I bought a couple of videos and saw the girls falling in or getting thrown in and I was so disappointed. I would never again buy a video in which the girls just get pushed in or fall, as they neither seem to want it nor seem to like it.

I like the moment when a girl gets in slowly, deeper and deeper enjoying what she does.

If wetlook is just an accident... well... it's just an accident... nothing more.

Are there any more feeling like me?

Report Abuse or Problem to Nigel at Minxmovies
If you enjoy this forum, then please make a small donation to help with running costs: (you can change amount)