Wetlook World Forum

Current time: Fri 19/04/24 05:22:30 GMT

Translate page FROM -> TO

Translate page TO <- FROM

Message # 36820.1

Subject: Re: New Round

Date: Tue 12/08/08 18:06:12 GMT

Name: AnthonyX

Email: anthonyx@jowc.net

Website:

Report Abuse or Problem to Nigel at Minxmovies
If you enjoy this forum, then please make a small donation to help
with running costs: (you can change amount)

Interesting generalizations... here are some specifics:

I'm not really a jeans fan... once in a while I do see a nice jeans pic, but for the most part, they don't do much for me.

I'll agree that rear shots aren't really what it's about for me... as with my jeans comment, I do find the occasional rear shot nice.

See-through isn't always my thing either... but it depends a lot on the model, for example the girl I believe is named Carmen:

http://www.flickr.com/photos/stormy-waters/71889493/in/set-72157594281566605/

She is a beautiful girl in many ways - including a nice hourglass shape. I think she has just about the best breasts for clingy/see-through wetlook I've ever seen.

This girl would also be among my favourites for similar reasons:

http://www.flickr.com/photos/stormy-waters/60644376/

Of course, more drenched is better... all the things we love about wetlook - cling, shine, transparency - depend on a girl being well-drenched.

In reply to Message (36820)

New Round

By Stormy Waters - Tue 12/08/08 14:46:10 GMT

Website:

http://www.flickr.com/photos/stormy-waters/sets/72157606075232005/with/72507617/

Here are some generalizations about which photos are the most popular with this crowd.

--jeans photos usually win

--rear shots usually don't

--the more see-through, the better

--the more drenched, the better

Report Abuse or Problem to Nigel at Minxmovies
If you enjoy this forum, then please make a small donation to help with running costs: (you can change amount)