minx

Wetlook World Forum

Current time: Fri 29/03/24 11:06:28 GMT

Translate page FROM gb -> TO de fr it nl es pt jp

Translate page TO gb <- FROM de fr it nl es pt jp

Wetlook-Online
Wetlook-Online

Message # 3257.3.2.1.1

Subject: Talking Re: Re: Re: Re: Likes and dislikes

Date: Wed 16/04/03 16:49:00 GMT

Name: Water Ski gb

Email: Water_Ski_2003@Hotmail.com

Website:

Report Abuse or Problem to Nigel at Minxmovies
If you enjoy this forum, then please make a small donation to help
with running costs: Make Donation (you can change amount)

Previous Reply
Next New Message
Active List Archive

Wetlook-Online
On the outdoor vs indoor issue, showers are much better at giving a scene a sense of intimacy, also, as I'll probably never own a pool it is easier to fantasise about being there, as I like soapy girls as well, the shower is the best place, and its warm. Not that I don't like pools, and large bodies of water, it just seems more voyeristic as there's at present no way for me to experience this side of wetlook, (in fact swimming fully clothed is something I'd very much like to try) but the teasing aspect of will she or won't she get wet is much better. Baths though are really frustrating, mainly because they are too small to move around in (especially with someone else) and although its indoors, soap tends to get washed straight off.

 

I like the girls to get undressed towards the end of their soakings and underwear is a must for me. In a sense, although thongs are pretty poor with a t-shirt, when worn under full clothing and then revealed can add to the spontinuity feel of things if the girl didn't know or except she was going to get wet, it can come as a nice surprise if I'm not expecting it either. Still, I generally prefer full backed panties.

 

The sicissors - paper - stone idea is great, although I'm quite competitive and would prefer a game with more skill if I was playing. Then the girl might believe she would stay much drier if she was a)better at the game or b) you lost a few on purpose to lure her into soaking you and getting cocky about it before getting revenge. Maybe noughts and crosses (tic-tac-toe), or connect four, no forget that, "soak-poker". Hmmm....

 

Before I finish, one place that seems to have been mostly over looked is the kitchen, although it wouldn't make particularily good scenes for producers, it is a good place to soak your partner or at least initiate a soaking. If you ever help your partner with the washing up (come on we're gentlemen afterall), try using your finger to redirect the taps as a spray. Voila, instant wetness. Hey, you can even do the in the bathroom when she's cleaning her teeth, at least then the shower isn't far away.

In reply to Message (3257.3.2.1) None Re: Re: Re: Likes and dislikes

By Pooldancer - us Wed 16/04/03 14:15:05 GMT

Website:


Another opinion which reflects my personal preference.

 

To answer several questions at once:

 

For me, wetlook is a fantasy.  he fantasy I have is one that includes a combination of a tease (Will she or won't she get wet), with the spontaneaty of dunking in clothing completely inappropriate for swimming.  (The more inappropriate for swimming, the more appropriate for wetlook) It should be obvious that she did not dress with the intent of getting wet, and she is therefore completely clothed, including underwear, jewelry, shoes, and hose.  Everything a woman would ordinarily wear to do ordinary things.

 

Because the most plausable location for being near water while wearing normal clothing is by a pool, that becomes my favorite location.  It doesn't hurt that anyone in a pool is completely soaked "to the skin", and got that way by jumping, diving, falling, being thrown, or slowly walking into the water.  Climbing out of the pool offers a chance for us to enjoy the sight of a beautifull woman whose clothing is now clinging, revealing her curves.

 

Whether the actual intent of the "scene" is "fun" or "erotic" is unimportant.  The reality is that a woman who is willing to dive into a pool while fully clothed is, by the mere fact that she is willing to do what is normally considered "wrong" is erotic.  The "fun" part is overshadowed by the "erotic" reality of the scene.  In my view, even the "girl next door" feeling of Eric Elsas's video's have an erotic undertone.  It almost seems as if the girls are having difficulty keeping their hands off each other, partly as a consequence of the wet, clinging, clothing.

 

There are several other scenes, and video's that capture the spontaneaty I enjoy:

 

David Wilkey did a short scene where a fully dressed girl walks out of her house to the pool.  She reaches down to test the water, and satisfied that it is warm, heads back to the house.  On the way, she stops, turns, walks back to the pool, dives in, still completely clothed, swims to the ladder, gets out and walks back to the house with her sopping wet clothing clinging to her every curve.

 

Nigel did a scene with the model siting at a bar with a pool in the background, talking to another girl.  The model decides to simply get up, walk toward the pool and, while still fully dressed, step into the water soaking every inch of her and her clothing.  The problems with this scene was the lighting (which is difficult in a real place), and the fact that the girl the model was talking to couldn't be convinced to jump in too.

 

Ocasionally, some of WAMTEC's clip tapes have the singer, hostess, or other person end up in the pool fully clothed.  These seem to be unexpected, but not unwanted, dunkings.  Some of the best could have been the "Mann-O-Mann" shows from years ago.  I say could have because the show credits are finished before anyone gets out of the water.  If the cameras kept rolling, the cutting room floor could have some spectacular wetlook footage.

 

If anyone is still with me, the key is unplanned, spontaneous, dunking while fully clothed. Because it is "wrong" to swim in all your clothing, the fact of the clothed dunking is erotic.  Any girl who is old enough to be discussed in this forum, is old enough to be aware of how really erotic she looks with her clothing clinging to her every curve, which adds to the erotic aspect, even if the dunking resulted from a "fun" game.  

In reply to Message (3257.3.2) Read This Re: Re: Likes and dislikes

By Renegade 17 - splishsplash@wamfox.co.uk gb Wed 16/04/03 10:05:53 GMT

Website: http://www.wamfox.com


Interesting post Kev!

 

My own taste is indeed mainly governed by the clothes the models are wearing - I'm about to start collecting Erik's tapes because I like his "casual, slightly scruffy, girl next door" approach.  My ideal would be to see girls in well-fitting industrial clothes, overalls, boiler-suits (coveralls in the US), work-dresses, real medical uniforms, etc - but I suspect I'm in a very small minority there!  I've managed to include a few shots like this on WamFox, but as it's not really Green's bottle of Southern Comfort I've not taken it to it's limits.  Some day, when we can afford to pay models... :-)

 

For underwear, I prefer when a model wears a one-piece swimsuit in a plain colour, black or dark blue or dark green, under her ordinary outer clothes.  To me, that indicates that she's dressed willingly to get wet, plus I prefer the simplicity of a plain lycra swimsuit to the frills and fancy-work you get on "normal" underwear.

 

I can see the point of a girl in a close-fitting dress or trousers wearing a thong beneath the clothes simply to avoid having a "visible pant line" - this would make for a smoother fit of her clothing, but I agree with the view others have expressed, thongs and t-shirts without "real" clothes over them aren't wetlook (or WAM), they're just a fraction away from nudity.  I dislike a lot of WAM sites (including many in the UMD) for this reason.  I think people who like nudity regard "wearing underwear" in the same category as "fully dressed", whereas to wetlookers and clothed-wammers, "just underwear" is something we'd lump in with the porn.

 

Other than WamFox, my own favourite wetlook site is probably Just Add Water - I especially love the denim dungaree set, and the way that Veronica gets wet slowly, just standing there while water is poured over her, first just a little on the shoulders, then more over her head and down her back, leading on to larger bucketfulls being poured on her from above.  It's also beautifully photographed, which makes a difference to me.  The only WAM pay site I've joined so far is MessyFun, mainly because even when the pictures aren't to my taste, you can admire Rob's stunning photography.

 

As to Candid stuff, I fully agree and so does Green - we've long felt that candid wetlook is both an invasion of privacy, and bad for the professional producers who have to struggle to pay their models.

 

Thinking about it, the other thing that "makes" a scene for me is when it's been shot from a "non-erotic" viewpoint.   I tend to dislike extreme close-ups of bent-over girls bottoms, or breasts, etc - I prefer to see the scene shot as a "fun" or "comedy" scene, even though the result, to me at least, is an erotic reaction.   So for example two fully clothed girls playing sicissors - paper - stone, with the winner throwing a cup of water over the looser of each round amid much laughter, would appeal to me far more than the same two girls in the same outfits doing a psuedo-lesbian act under a shower.

 

How do other people feel about this?  Do more prefer "fun" shoots or "erotic" ones?

 

 - Renegade 17

 - http://www.wamfox.com

In reply to Message (3257.3) Info Re: Likes and dislikes

By Kev - kev.styx@ntlworld.com gb Wed 16/04/03 07:18:02 GMT

Website: www.styxwetworld.com


Interesting points.

 

First thing to bear in mind is that this forum, although the biggest wetlook forum, reflects the views of maybe less than 1% of the wetlook community. There's a whole range of likes and dislikes that never get aired.

 

These views are either sent privately in emails to the various producers (no doubt they too have many member's and customers who would never post on the forum)or we have to tease out what's popular by looking at responses to various sets- how many are sold or downloaded.

 

There's no doubt that many people prefer outdoor wetlook. But it is really a fantasy, whereas many people actually like the "reality" of indoor locations. Let's face it wherever you are in the world, water in lakes and rivers is cold. To most people "real" wet activities take place in warm water- in the bath or shower. Quite few people enjoy this aspect. If you ever want to get a wife or girlfriend to indulge you'd be crazy to get her get in the river- you'd stand a better chance with a bath of warm water.

 

I think a shower can be brilliant for showing off wet clothing, in many ways superior to a pool or river. Clothes can be wet gradually and the sight of water running down a girls hair and across her face it extremely popular and can most effectively done  in a shower. Likewise, skirts tend to stay down, rather than riding up around a girls waist which you tend to get rivers, pool (and baths for that matter).

 

Many people also love the sight of the clothes (and girl) getting washed- this looks somewhat peculiar in a river and even worse in a pool. Many pool owners are not too pleased at the prospect of shampoo being used in their pools either.

 

I've seen some really boring wetlook shot in pools, I don't think the location matters a great deal. If all a girl does is get into the pool and then get out again wet, then you might as well have shot it in a bath. At least in a bath of warm water you are more likely to achieve the sort of response you want from a girl- not cajoling her to "smile and look happy" whilst she's freezing to death in a river.

 

Seriously, the biggest "drivers" on what's popular is mainly down to how pretty the girl is, and what she's wearing. Location tends to come very much in third place to the majority of wetlook followers

 

Agreement on the thongs issue- widespread disapproval of the 99% of wetlook fans who make up the "silent majority"

 

The only way to capture any accidental fallings in, is to either be extremely lucky or to "lurk" and find candid shots.

 

I cannot comment on other producers views, but the Styx view is that candid pictures are an intrusion into someone else's privacy. I wouldn't like my loved ones to appear on a fetish site (of any description) and therefore wouldn't subject someone elses wife/daughter/sister to that- it's a matter of principle

 

 

 

 

In reply to Message (3257) Hello Likes and dislikes

By Sopping - us Wed 16/04/03 06:14:41 GMT

Website:


In the past I have put these and similar thoughts on these pages, and in my “column”[when I had one at the WetCasual site.] I have been both flamed and complimented.

 

So, not attempting to trash others' preferences, and in the interests of maintaining conversation on these pages, I shall fire off a few more rounds.

 

Outdoors vs indoors: Like many others on these pages I vastly prefer wetlook scenes in fountains, streams, lakes, rivers and beaches. Pools are good too, and they may be both outdoor on indoor. Unfortunately, in pool parties in particular, the range of a camera flash on indoor pictures too often falls too short.

 

Tubs and showers fall short since there are limited scenes, scenarios and such available. A girl gets into a tub and gets wet..period. Sometimes with gestures, sometimes frozen faced.

 

A girl steps into a shower and turns it on. She gets wet. End of sequence!

 

Shallow water vs deep water.  This is possibly a minor matter, but I prefer to see a gal waist deep in waist-deep water rather than sitting down in knee-deep or less shallow water. It somehow gives me a bigger kick!

 

I detest thongs. I do not consider a skimpy T-shirt or top over thongs to be wetlook. In fact, like others here, I detest thongs. The girls'butts look like a well-baked loaf of bread. I really am not fond of bikini bottoms either.  But pantie briefs, particularly black can be really sezy!And the new style of "boy shorts" offers promise.

 

I prefer seeing a bra under a soaked shirt or blouse. Don’t ask me why.

 

Finally, I would love to see a photo of a girl actually falling into the water in a summer dress.. Really...accidentally.

 

I’ve seen it happen, and I actually photographed it once,

 

S:

Report Abuse or Problem to Nigel at Minxmovies
If you enjoy this forum, then please make a small donation to help with running costs: Make Donation (you can change amount)

All WAM Drunk Sex Orgy WetLooker.com
WetlookPOV.com

Minx Movies - M12 - Dressed in Wet is now in the Download Store
Download Store

Minx Movies - M15 - Wet Me Now is now in the Download Store
Download Store

Minx Movies - M14 - Get Wet With Me is now in the Download Store
2ipmd65.jpg2ipmdg2.jpgckfbj77.jpgjapgs25.jpgzgjbt99.jpg Download Store 2fpbs94.jpgkijws74.jpgrlsps97.jpglasbjg7.jpg2fptg96.jpg2gpdde7.jpg


Minx Movies - M8 - Mask Of Wetness is now in the Download Store
Download Store



[ This page took 0.023 seconds to generate ]