Wetlook World Forum

Current time: Thu 25/04/24 01:49:08 GMT

Translate page FROM -> TO

Translate page TO <- FROM

Message # 32136.1.1

Subject: Re: A youtube observation.

Date: Mon 15/10/07 17:52:29 GMT

Name: ricoh

Email: sibryan_68@hotmail.com

Website:

Report Abuse or Problem to Nigel at Minxmovies
If you enjoy this forum, then please make a small donation to help
with running costs: (you can change amount)

Partially agree. I like the big build up of a good looking woman being carried to the pool but then its good to see them get out again. There is a clip called boss in the pool from a hotel where she is carried there thrown in and we see her full length afterwards, perfect clip!

In reply to Message (32136.1)

Re: A youtube observation.

By wetwhiteandblue - Mon 15/10/07 14:11:41 GMT

Website:

I agree! I don't even consider some of these clips wetlook if the subject is completely submerged throughout the whole clip. It's a total waste of time unless the subject is completely out of the water or in the process of getting out. Yes, it would be nice if they would cut to the chase and leave out the submerged part of the clip. Unfortunately the person taking the clips have a complete intent in mind - completely opposite of ours.

In reply to Message (32136)

A youtube observation.

By Sopping - katakai1@verizon.net Mon 15/10/07 13:40:11 GMT

Website:

I enjoy the wet youtubes as much as many, I suppose. I have posted a few, and will do so in the future.

But why waste everyone's time with bumpy, jerky footage of the efforts to drage a girl to the pool (often taking many minutes), and then only show a few seconds of her actually goin going into the water and in the pool? It is a complete waste of time, IMO. There are at least three of this type posted today.

Report Abuse or Problem to Nigel at Minxmovies
If you enjoy this forum, then please make a small donation to help with running costs: (you can change amount)