Wetlook World ForumCurrent time: Fri 29/03/24 12:09:09 GMT |
Message # 31274.1.1.1 Subject: Re: Wetlook: benign fetish or sexual deviency? Date: Sun 02/09/07 17:53:10 GMT Name: WetLeesSteve |
Report Abuse or Problem to Nigel at Minxmovies
|
I enjoy watching women get wet, being a guy, I prefer women. I too prefer the jeans and tennis shoes. I prefer to see them dressed and not stripping. I might think the devience is looking at that stuff on a regular basis. But in that case, you are defying your own age.
___________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
I just want to clarify this statement. It made no sense at all on the third read. . . I left out a key word. OOPS
I enjoy watching women get wet, being a guy, I prefer women. I too prefer the jeans and tennis shoes. I prefer to see them dressed and not stripping. I might think the devience is looking at that PORN stuff on a regular basis. But in that case, you are defying your own age. ___________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
And please, by all means. Mark your thread with nudity or underage stuff. This way, those of us who do not want to see it, can just skip over. Some of you have done a good job of it. But some. . . . . .
|
In reply to Message (31274.1.1) Re: Wetlook: benign fetish or sexual deviency?
By WetLeesSteve - Sun 02/09/07 17:47:25 GMT I agree with you Wisc. I don't care for the under age/nudity either. When I see it, I don't linger on the page. I just don't want to see it. The underage stuff, I have a very low tollarance for.
As far as the line between them, I don't think we are being defiant, it's something we like to do.
I enjoy watching women get wet, being a guy, I prefer women. I too prefer the jeans and tennis shoes. I prefer to see them dressed and not stripping. I might think the devience is looking at that stuff on a regular basis. But in that case, you are defying your own age.
The discussion of marking your thread ran through here a month or so ago. I have to agree it should be done. Let the deviates look at that stuff. |
In reply to Message (31274.1) Re: Wetlook: benign fetish or sexual deviency?
By wetinwisc - cheesehead1965@hotmail.com Sat 01/09/07 22:20:16 GMT I consider wetlook to be a benign fetish, rather than sexual deviancy. I also feel that wetlook must be voluntary, and not forced, so I don't really like the pics and videos where women are being thrown into water. Just because a woman's dressed in shorts, t-shirt, and tennis shoes doesn't mean that she wouldn't mind getting those clothes wet, even if it's a very hot day. I also feel that any images that feature females under 18 (16 and 17 year olds) should be flagged the same way people who post links to sites that feature nudity and porn flag their postings. I'm not bothered by nudity, but I understand some people here are. And here in North America, the government doesn't like sites that feature images of people under 18 viewed for sexual gratification, whereas in Europe 16 and 17 year-olds can be featured in those images as long as they keep their clothes on. |
In reply to Message (31274) Wetlook: benign fetish or sexual deviency?
By Wet Guy - Sat 01/09/07 21:48:54 GMT Just wondering what you guys think about this question. Where do you think the line is drawn? I'm going through some issues at the moment and would be pleased to get the insights of others in the community. Thank you. |
Report Abuse or Problem to Nigel at Minxmovies
If you enjoy this forum, then please make a small donation to help with running costs:
(you can change amount)
|
[ This page took 0.051 seconds to generate ]