Wetlook World ForumCurrent time: Fri 19/04/24 03:00:30 GMT |
Message # 31274.1 Subject: Re: Wetlook: benign fetish or sexual deviency? Date: Sat 01/09/07 22:20:16 GMT Name: wetinwisc Email: cheesehead1965@hotmail.com |
Report Abuse or Problem to Nigel at Minxmovies
|
I consider wetlook to be a benign fetish, rather than sexual deviancy. I also feel that wetlook must be voluntary, and not forced, so I don't really like the pics and videos where women are being thrown into water. Just because a woman's dressed in shorts, t-shirt, and tennis shoes doesn't mean that she wouldn't mind getting those clothes wet, even if it's a very hot day. I also feel that any images that feature females under 18 (16 and 17 year olds) should be flagged the same way people who post links to sites that feature nudity and porn flag their postings. I'm not bothered by nudity, but I understand some people here are. And here in North America, the government doesn't like sites that feature images of people under 18 viewed for sexual gratification, whereas in Europe 16 and 17 year-olds can be featured in those images as long as they keep their clothes on. |
In reply to Message (31274) Wetlook: benign fetish or sexual deviency?
By Wet Guy - Sat 01/09/07 21:48:54 GMT Just wondering what you guys think about this question. Where do you think the line is drawn? I'm going through some issues at the moment and would be pleased to get the insights of others in the community. Thank you. |
Report Abuse or Problem to Nigel at Minxmovies
If you enjoy this forum, then please make a small donation to help with running costs:
(you can change amount)
|
[ This page took 0.021 seconds to generate ]