Wetlook World ForumCurrent time: Sat 20/04/24 11:03:36 GMT |
Message # 29503.2.2 Subject: Re: old or new? Date: Sat 02/06/07 16:41:56 GMT Name: AnthonyX Email: anthonyx@jowc.net |
Report Abuse or Problem to Nigel at Minxmovies
|
I'd grant you that the visual style parallels some of the "classics" of wetlook from years past, but you'd have to consider:
1. The images don't appear to have any of the artifacts you will typically see in scans of older images 2. She's promoting herself for modelling work. Where is the logic in using 16 year old pictures for a modelling portfolio and representing them as current? If she looked like that 16 years ago she won't look that way now, and if she looks that way now, she couldn't have looked that way 16 years ago.
Give a cute girl a break - especially one who is willing to put herself out there and embrace wetlook as she does.
Tammy, keep right on doing what you are doing!
|
In reply to Message (29503.2) Re: update!!!!!!!! wet jeans!!!
By Mmmmppf - Sat 02/06/07 08:07:57 GMT Do you expect us to believe these photos are new? They are obviously scans of photos taken years ago. That is O.K., they are decent photos but please don't try to make us believe these are taken recently. |
In reply to Message (29503) update!!!!!!!! wet jeans!!!
By tammylou - tammyj84@aol.com Sat 02/06/07 07:33:36 GMT Website: http://www.tammylou.co.uk hi there's an update of me fetting my jeans wet. also there's some new glamour pictures as well. hope you like x |
Report Abuse or Problem to Nigel at Minxmovies
If you enjoy this forum, then please make a small donation to help with running costs:
(you can change amount)
|
[ This page took 0.015 seconds to generate ]