Wetlook World ForumCurrent time: Thu 18/04/24 14:01:49 GMT |
Message # 29236.1 Subject: Re: Possible aspect of wetlook that is often ignored or not addressed Date: Mon 21/05/07 01:58:30 GMT Name: AnthonyX Email: anthonyx@jowc.net |
Report Abuse or Problem to Nigel at Minxmovies
|
It's nice in theory, probably nice for the woman who enjoys being wet, but the visible signs of wet clothes disappear very quickly, long before the clothes are actually dry.
There's little point to showing a woman in wet clothes more than a couple of minutes after she's climbed out of the pool or bath, turned off the shower, etc., because she won't appear wet anymore. A video producer could probably shoot a girl dry and after she's been soaked, mix the before and "2 minutes+" after, and nobody would know the difference (disregarding other clues like wet hair).
|
In reply to Message (29236) Possible aspect of wetlook that is often ignored or not addressed
By Maurice - Mon 21/05/07 01:39:48 GMT Hey everyone. Firstly i hope im not critizising any of the wetlook producers, in my opinion their doing a fantastic job but there is one aspect of wetlook that i rarely ever see. That is the drying off stage after the woman has become wet. I find this to be an extreme turn on, just as much as she is in the water. When a woman's cltohes are wet and she is walking around, doing whatever she does, not caring that her clothes are soaked. that just drives me wild and i do wish to see more of this. Does anyone else is share this view? |
Report Abuse or Problem to Nigel at Minxmovies
If you enjoy this forum, then please make a small donation to help with running costs:
(you can change amount)
|
[ This page took 0.070 seconds to generate ]