Wetlook World Forum

Current time: Thu 18/04/24 07:42:54 GMT

Translate page FROM -> TO

Translate page TO <- FROM

Message # 22978.3.2

Subject: That's prolly why I dont care for jeans -- they're appropriate swimwear too [nt]

Date: Tue 13/06/06 17:24:31 GMT

Name: Jerney Verney (my final post here)

Email:

Website:

Report Abuse or Problem to Nigel at Minxmovies
If you enjoy this forum, then please make a small donation to help
with running costs: (you can change amount)

(no text)

In reply to Message (22978.3)

Re: random thoughts: the critical part of pictures or real life wet sightings

By Bostonwet - Tue 13/06/06 05:41:53 GMT

Website:

I`ll take it to the next step; If she`s not soaked from head to toe I find it of little interest as far as wetlook goes. Although I, like GOP, enjoy seeing a woman pee her pants, it`s a different interest. Like Victor and some others I prefer long intact jeans w/ belt for wetlook along with full skirts & dresses and again I`ll go on to say that I prefer long sleeved shirts, blouses & sweaters over tank tops & t-shirts. IMHO shorts & t-shirts/tanks are appropriate swimwear and therefore not wetlook. In the past there have been many discussions about what is or is not wetlook and oviously everyone has their opinion. Some have even posted links to bathing suit pictures on this forum; to each his own I guess.......In the part of the US where I grew up (New England) girls swimming in shorts/t/tank outfits were common and therefore became of little interest to me. Here`s a question on this same topic that I bet will be answered according to one`s generation: Do you prefer the jeans look of the past decades ( belted jeans, bells or straightleg, not cut too low w/ standard panties underneath, in general a neater look) or the contemporary look ( low cut bells w/ thong hanging out the top, falling down when wet)?

In reply to Message (22978)

random thoughts: the critical part of pictures or real life wet sightings

By G.O.P. - Mon 12/06/06 19:02:57 GMT

Website:

Let me start off by saying that I am not criticizing anyone else for their picture finds or their opinions about what constitutes good wetlook. I have just had this on my mind for awhile, and thought it would be nice to share with everyone what really does it for me about seeing wet women (and getting wet myself). I also hope that you don't find my description too graphic.

I find it very frustrating to see a wet picture that shows only the top, and omits the wet pants/shorts/skirt. Immensely more frustrating is a picture (or even worse, real life sighting) where a woman's shirt/blouse gets very wet, but her pants/shorts/skirt remain fairly dry. For me, the best part about a soaking wet woman is seeing her wet crotch. IThe simple knowledge that she is wet between her legs, that her panties are wet, and that she is feeling wetness on her private parts. It totally ruins everything for me and is so frustrating to see a woman that got wet elsewhere, but remained dry in her intimate area. Don't get me wrong, I do enjoy seeing wet shirts/blouses. I enjoy seeing the clinginess and shininess of wet clothes overall. But the best part is the simple knowledge that the woman is feeling wetness where it really counts. it is the same for me when I get wet. The best part is feeling my wet underwear against my "special parts". I do not mean to knock the wet t-shirt fans. If that is what you enjoy most, I wish you the best of luck in seeing lots of them. Desert Hawk, I hope you get to see lots of those partially wet clothes splattered with water that you love so much. I hope Barry sees lots of good wet socks. It is just that for me, if a woman isn't wet where it really counts, she is dry in my opinion. I am not saying that I actually want to see her wet private area. That would not be wetlook, that would be plain old porn. I just like to see a woman's wet clothes, especially her wet crotch, and know that she is feeling her wet clothes against her most intimate area. I bet a psychoanalyst could have a lot of fun with what I have written today! I think it has to do with my early experiences with peeing my pants. As I have mentioned before, I was into wetTING before wetLOOK. You can search the archives for a treatise on that subject, but my interest in wetlook pretty much developed as an outgrowth of my interest in pants peeing. Maybe what I have written today is starting to make some sense now. We all have our own idiosyncrases (spell?). We all have our favorite sub-genres in the overall somewhat broad topic of wetlook. I just thought everyone might be interested in my views on the subject. Comments are most welcome.

Report Abuse or Problem to Nigel at Minxmovies
If you enjoy this forum, then please make a small donation to help with running costs: (you can change amount)