Wetlook World ForumCurrent time: Fri 29/03/24 09:28:05 GMT |
Message # 22874.1.2.1 Subject: Re: A tad ironic, perhaps? Date: Wed 07/06/06 06:38:37 GMT Name: Andrew |
Report Abuse or Problem to Nigel at Minxmovies
|
Well Eromaxx is problematic, but it does have some wetlook and WAM (well, more then some, quite a lot) without nudity, not too mention hardcore, for instance the first couple pages of almost every set on Allwam. I don't like the other strictly hardcore sites at all and am also not to happy with them here, but you must understand Nigel. He is not a charity.
Andrew. |
In reply to Message (22874.1.2) A tad ironic, perhaps?
By AnthonyX - anthonyx@jowc.net Wed 07/06/06 06:27:38 GMT Links to hard-core sites not permitted in postings, but OK as sponsoring ads?
I have no problem with a free forum using advertising in order to be self-supporting, just wondering about the application of standards.
|
In reply to Message (22874.1) this free forum probobly costs Nigel a lot to run...
By Andrew - Wed 07/06/06 01:09:12 GMT better Eromaxx banners and free acces, then no banners and payments from users IMHO.
Andrew. |
In reply to Message (22874) sick porn banners at the top! [nt]
By courier - splash@hot.ee Tue 06/06/06 22:53:49 GMT (no text) |
Report Abuse or Problem to Nigel at Minxmovies
If you enjoy this forum, then please make a small donation to help with running costs:
(you can change amount)
|
[ This page took 0.026 seconds to generate ]