Wetlook World ForumCurrent time: Fri 29/03/24 08:58:19 GMT |
Message # 22718.2 Subject: Re: I don't mind guys in the pictures. Sometimes I like. Date: Mon 29/05/06 12:19:12 GMT Name: Victor Email: victor.ivanovich@mail.ru |
Report Abuse or Problem to Nigel at Minxmovies
|
First I should say that I'm a watcher. I'm not into getting wet myself. I hate rain. Shower? I've tried a few times but I would rather do it in the nature. Of course it would be fun to go for a clothed swim with a girl but I haven't had a chance yet. But if I sea guys getting wet together with girls I don't mind their presence. They don't matter for me. And if there is one or several half-naked guys and a clothed girl in the pic (or vid), I like such pictures even more, because in this case the girls looks more to advantage. |
In reply to Message (22718) Like guys with the girls in pics?
By RoscoeBC - Mon 29/05/06 06:24:27 GMT Poll time. I've seen some interesting reactions along these lines, but I've never seen a poll. Do you prefer women only in wet pics, or guys in the pics with them? I've seen hostile reactions to pictures with guys in there with the women, which I personally think is a homophobic reaction, otherwise who cares as long as there are women in the picture? Personally I like some pictures with a guy in them (as long as the guy isn't showing his stuff for the camera to try to turn me on) because I can fantasize about it being me :), and I'd like to be there, not because I'm checking out the guy. Anybody on my side?
I'm wondering if the reaction would be split between doers and watchers? I suppose if you like to look at wet women, but don't enjoy getting wet yourself, there is no point in having a guy in the picture you can identify with, because you wouldn't want to be there anyway?
Eric, you reading? How many subscribe to wetclothing couples compared to the girls only sites?
|
Report Abuse or Problem to Nigel at Minxmovies
If you enjoy this forum, then please make a small donation to help with running costs:
(you can change amount)
|
[ This page took 0.020 seconds to generate ]