Wetlook World Forum

Current time: Thu 25/04/24 10:16:10 GMT

Translate page FROM -> TO

Translate page TO <- FROM

Message # 22712.3.1.2

Subject: definition of WAM

Date: Mon 29/05/06 15:17:36 GMT

Name: G.O.P.

Email:

Website:

Report Abuse or Problem to Nigel at Minxmovies
If you enjoy this forum, then please make a small donation to help
with running costs: (you can change amount)

WAM stands for Wet And Messy. WAM is not about wetlook with only water, and it is also not about "watersports" ie. pee. WAM is about getting messy with slime, pies and other food, cooking oil, jello wrestling, etc. Another word for WAM is "gunge". It can be either clothed or nude. For some people, it is about seeing others ge tmessy, for some it is about getting yourself messy, and for some it is both. For some people the attraction is mostly in getting bodies messy, so they would prefer nude. For others (including myself) the attraction is about getting clothes messy. www.umd.net is the place to go for more about WAM. Wetlook, WAM, and watersports are three seperate fetishes, although there are many people who are into two or all three of them. I enjoy seeing women get their clothes wet, and I enjoy getting wet in clothes myself. I enjoy seeing women get slimed, pied, etc., but I have never done it myself. As for watersports, I enjoy seeing women pee their pants, and I enjoy peeing my pants. I am not at all into golden showers, pee drinking, or any other aspect of the urine fetish. For me, pants wetting is about messing up clothes. It gives me a different feeling than wet with water, but my interest in pee stops with pants wetting.

In reply to Message (22712.3.1)

Re: Re: "Wet clothing" or "wetlook" -- the difference?

By Jerney Verney - Mon 29/05/06 07:49:26 GMT

Website:

Yep that's sort of what I was trying to say in my longish post above; getting wet in clothes can be fun without it being sexual or a fetish.

The fun can be in the spontaneity of swimming in whatever you are wearing at the time, or where it is impractical to change for reasons of modesty (which would otherwise mean not getting wet).

Unfortunately there seems to be no public-domain name for this; I call it WAM because it isn't really wet_look_; however WAM means so many different things to the general public, and is often associated with fetishes such as watersports (which I won't even discuss here due to its flame war possibilities).

As there isn't really a name, clothed swimming lacks a readily-accessible _meme_ (concept hook) for recognition by the general public :-|

SW, FW, and BH :-)

In reply to Message (22712.3)

Re: "Wet clothing" or "wetlook" -- the difference?

By RoscoeBC - Mon 29/05/06 06:12:47 GMT

Website:

I hate to make this even more fragmented, but if you're going to split it up, maybe three ways are necessary. There are those of us that like to look at thers getting wet because it's a sexual thrill, definately wetlook. There are those that get a sexual turn on out of getting wet, and there are those that like getting wet, probably more to do with rebellion or cooling off, it's not particularly sexual, which I wouldn't call wetlook. Personally, getting wet is sexual for me so I''m less likely to do it in public than someone who does it to cool off or just to be fun or rebellious. I suppose wetlook is kind of a misnomer for someone getting themselves wet, but I never differentiated.

In reply to Message (22712)

"Wet clothing" or "wetlook" -- the difference?

By Telcontar - mrnemesis@ntlworld.com Sun 28/05/06 18:48:48 GMT

Website:

Still thinking about this Wikipedia article, and trying to track down a good example of a wet clothing photograph.

I've been struck with a thought -- is there not a distinct difference between wet clothing (e.g. Nasse Klamotten, Wet Clothing Club Berlin, NJCO) and wetlook (e.g. modelled wetlook, candid wet pics)? Wetlook is all about how people other than oneself look, but when you swim in clothes for fun, that is wet clothing -- you're doing it for the experience, not the look.

As such, should these not be kept as separate articles in Wikipedia? And if so, do I now need a new second picture to illustrate the wetlook article? And of what?

And does anyone here feel qualified to write an article about wet clothing as an activity? I barely feel qualified to work on the wetlook article as I know so very little about wetlook really, but it's always the least qualified people who end up having to do it :P

Report Abuse or Problem to Nigel at Minxmovies
If you enjoy this forum, then please make a small donation to help with running costs: (you can change amount)